Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDetermination of the vapor pressures of moth sex pheromone components by a gas chromatographic method    Next AbstractElectroantennogram and single sensillum recording in insect antennae »

Chem Senses


Title:A flux capacitor for moth pheromones
Author(s):Olsson SB; Hansson BS;
Address:"Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell Strasse 8, Jena, DE 07745, Germany. solsson@ice.mpg.de"
Journal Title:Chem Senses
Year:2012
Volume:20120214
Issue:4
Page Number:295 - 298
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs007
ISSN/ISBN:1464-3553 (Electronic) 0379-864X (Linking)
Abstract:"In this issue of Chemical Senses, Baker et al. propose a provocative and intriguing explanation for a commonly observed phenomenon in moth chemocommunication. Sex pheromones in moths typically consist of mixtures of long-chain unsaturated compounds in specific ratios. These ratios are correspondingly detected by male moths using separate olfactory sensory neurons for each pheromone component housed singly or multiply in long trichoid sensilla on the antennal surface. These neurons are often present in different proportions, typically with the neuron responding to the highest ratio component present in greatest abundance or with the largest dendritic diameter. In their article, Baker et al. postulate that these physical differences in neuron magnitudes arise to compensate for the higher molecular flux present with the most abundant pheromone components. Such a suggestion raises several questions concerning the physiological and behavioral nature of pheromone communication. Specifically, is the flux in a natural pheromone plume high enough to warrant increased flux detection for the most abundant components? Second, how can changes in neuronal number or size lead to increased flux detection? And finally, how would this increased flux detection be accomplished at molecular, cellular, and ultimately network scales? We address each of these questions and propose future experiments that could offer insight into the stimulating proposition raised by Baker et al"
Keywords:"Animals Dendrites/*physiology Female Male Moths/*physiology Olfactory Receptor Neurons/*physiology Receptors, Pheromone/*physiology Sensilla/*physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineOlsson, Shannon B Hansson, Bill S eng Comment Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/02/16 Chem Senses. 2012 May; 37(4):295-8. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs007. Epub 2012 Feb 14"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024