Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractGlow Discharge Plasma Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Direct Detection of Oxygenated Organic Compounds in the Gas-phase    Next AbstractFelix Hoppe-Seyler Lecture 1999. Cyclin dependent kinases and regulation of the fission yeast cell cycle »

Trop Biomed


Title:Comparative performance of two commercial neonicotinoid baits against filth flies under field conditions
Author(s):Nurita AT; Abu Hassan A;
Address:"Medical Entomology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden Pulau Pinang, Malaysia"
Journal Title:Trop Biomed
Year:2010
Volume:27
Issue:3
Page Number:559 - 565
DOI:
ISSN/ISBN:2521-9855 (Electronic) 0127-5720 (Linking)
Abstract:"Two performance (efficacy and attractiveness) comparisons of neonicotinoid baits QuickBayt(R) (imidacloprid) and Agita(R) (thiamethoxam) against filth flies were conducted under field conditions to determine suitability for use outdoors. The first experiment compared bait performance and the second compared effects of different applications on QuickBayt(R) performance. Applications compared were: (i) scattered in petri dish (SPD); (ii) wet-down in petri dish (WPD); (iii) scattered on cardboard (SCB) and (iv) painted on cardboards (PCB). Efficacy and attractiveness were assessed based on knockdown percentage (KD%) and number of flies feeding on baits, respectively. The KD% of QuickBayt(R) (34% +/- 3.0%) was not significantly higher than Agita(R) (29% +/- 1.3%) (t-test, P>0.05). Agita(R) (101 +/- 5.7 flies) was significantly more attractive to flies than QuickBayt(R) (76 +/- 4.8 flies) and the sugar solution (49 +/- 7.2) (one-way ANOVA, P<0.05). The PCB and SCB applications were significantly more attractive to filth flies than WPD and SPD (One-way ANOVA, P<0.05), however differences in KD% were not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, P>0.05). The two baits provided the same level of efficacy in a wide-open area against filth flies of various species. QuickBayt(R) was more versatile; efficacy was not significantly affected by different applications. Surface area and moisture affects attractiveness of the bait"
Keywords:Animals Diptera/*drug effects Imidazoles/chemistry/*pharmacology Insect Control/methods Insecticides/chemistry/*pharmacology Neonicotinoids Nitro Compounds/chemistry/*pharmacology Oxazines/chemistry/*pharmacology Pheromones/*chemistry/*pharmacology Surviv;
Notes:"MedlineNurita, A T Abu Hassan, A eng Comparative Study Malaysia 2011/03/15 Trop Biomed. 2010 Dec; 27(3):559-65"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024