Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractComparative GC-EAD responses of a specialist (Microplitis croceipes) and a generalist (Cotesia marginiventris) parasitoid to cotton volatiles induced by two caterpillar species    Next AbstractFlooding and herbivory: the effect of concurrent stress factors on plant volatile emissions and gene expression in two heirloom tomato varieties »

J Insect Physiol


Title:Electroantennogram (EAG) responses of Microplitis croceipes and Cotesia marginiventris and their lepidopteran hosts to a wide array of odor stimuli: correlation between EAG response and degree of host specificity?
Author(s):Ngumbi E; Chen L; Fadamiro H;
Address:"Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA"
Journal Title:J Insect Physiol
Year:2010
Volume:20100408
Issue:9
Page Number:1260 - 1268
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.03.032
ISSN/ISBN:1879-1611 (Electronic) 0022-1910 (Linking)
Abstract:"In order to test whether the electroantennogram (EAG) response spectrum of an insect correlates to its degree of host specificity, we recorded EAG responses of two parasitoid species with different degrees of host specificity, Microplitis croceipes (specialist) and Cotesia marginiventris (generalist), to a wide array of odor stimuli including compounds representing green leaf volatiles (GLVs), herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPV), ecologically irrelevant (not used by the parasitoid species and their hosts for host location) plant volatiles, and host-specific odor stimuli (host sex pheromones, and extracts of host caterpillar body and frass). We also tested the EAG responses of female moths of the caterpillar hosts of the parasitoids, Heliothis virescens and Spodoptera exigua, to some of the odor stimuli. We hypothesized that the specialist parasitoid will have a narrower EAG response spectrum than the generalist, and that the two lepidopteran species, which are similar in their host plant use, will show similar EAG response spectra to plant volatiles. As predicted, the specialist parasitoid showed greater EAG responses than the generalist to host-specific odor and one HIPV (cis-3-hexenyl butyrate), whereas the generalist showed relatively greater EAG responses to the GLVs and unrelated plant volatiles. We detected no differences in the EAG responses of H. virescens and S. exigua to any of the tested odor"
Keywords:"Animals Electrophysiology/*methods Host-Parasite Interactions/physiology Larva/chemistry/parasitology/physiology Moths/chemistry/*parasitology/*physiology *Odorants Plant Leaves/chemistry Species Specificity Stimulation, Chemical Volatile Organic Compound;"
Notes:"MedlineNgumbi, Esther Chen, Li Fadamiro, Henry eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2010/04/08 J Insect Physiol. 2010 Sep; 56(9):1260-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.03.032. Epub 2010 Apr 8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024