Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractGC/MS analysis of some bioactive constituents from Carthamus lanatus L    Next AbstractHuman chemical signature: Investigation on the influence of human presence and selected activities on concentrations of airborne constituents »

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol


Title:Comparison of the impact of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 and a cigarette on indoor air quality
Author(s):Mitova MI; Campelos PB; Goujon-Ginglinger CG; Maeder S; Mottier N; Rouget EG; Tharin M; Tricker AR;
Address:"Philip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Quai Jeanrenaud 5, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland (part of Philip Morris International group of companies). Electronic address: maya.mitova@pmi.com. Philip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Quai Jeanrenaud 5, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland (part of Philip Morris International group of companies)"
Journal Title:Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Year:2016
Volume:20160614
Issue:
Page Number:91 - 101
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.06.005
ISSN/ISBN:1096-0295 (Electronic) 0273-2300 (Linking)
Abstract:"The impact of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS 2.2) on indoor air quality was evaluated in an environmentally controlled room using ventilation conditions recommended for simulating 'Office', 'Residential' and 'Hospitality' environments and was compared with smoking a lit-end cigarette (Marlboro Gold) under identical experimental conditions. The concentrations of eighteen indoor air constituents (respirable suspended particles (RSP) < 2.5 mum in diameter), ultraviolet particulate matter (UVPM), fluorescent particulate matter (FPM), solanesol, 3-ethenylpyridine, nicotine, 1,3-butadiene, acrylonitrile, benzene, isoprene, toluene, acetaldehyde, acrolein, crotonaldehyde, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and combined oxides of nitrogen) were measured. In simulations evaluating THS 2.2, the concentrations of most studied analytes did not exceed the background concentrations determined when non-smoking panelists were present in the environmentally controlled room under equivalent conditions. Only acetaldehyde and nicotine concentrations were increased above background concentrations in the 'Office' (3.65 and 1.10 mug/m(3)), 'Residential' (5.09 and 1.81 mug/m(3)) and 'Hospitality' (1.40 and 0.66 mug/m(3)) simulations, respectively. Smoking Marlboro Gold resulted in greater increases in the concentrations of acetaldehyde (58.8, 83.8 and 33.1 mug/m(3)) and nicotine (34.7, 29.1 and 34.6 mug/m(3)) as well as all other measured indoor air constituents in the 'Office', 'Residential' and 'Hospitality' simulations, respectively"
Keywords:"Adult Air Pollutants/*adverse effects Air Pollution, Indoor/*adverse effects *Electrical Equipment and Supplies Environment, Controlled Environmental Monitoring/*methods Equipment Design Hot Temperature Humans Inhalation Exposure/*adverse effects Middle A;"
Notes:"MedlineMitova, Maya I Campelos, Pedro B Goujon-Ginglinger, Catherine G Maeder, Serge Mottier, Nicolas Rouget, Emmanuel G R Tharin, Manuel Tricker, Anthony R eng Comparative Study Netherlands 2016/06/18 Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Oct; 80:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 14"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024