Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract2-Butanone as a carbon dioxide mimic in attractant blends for the Afrotropical malaria mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus    Next AbstractModulation of the estrous cycle by pheromones from pregnant and lactating rats »

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol


Title:Odor discrimination in classical conditioning of proboscis extension in two stingless bee species in comparison to Africanized honeybees
Author(s):Mc Cabe SI; Hartfelder K; Santana WC; Farina WM;
Address:"Grupo de Estudio de Insectos Sociales, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biologia Experimental, IFIBYNE-CONICET. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellon II, Ciudad Universitaria, (C1428EHA), Buenos Aires, Argentina"
Journal Title:J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol
Year:2007
Volume:20070821
Issue:11
Page Number:1089 - 1099
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0260-8
ISSN/ISBN:0340-7594 (Print) 0340-7594 (Linking)
Abstract:"Learning in insects has been extensively studied using different experimental approaches. One of them, the proboscis extension response (PER) paradigm, is particularly well suited for quantitative studies of cognitive abilities of honeybees under controlled conditions. The goal of this study was to analyze the capability of three eusocial bee species to be olfactory conditioned in the PER paradigm. We worked with two Brazilian stingless bees species, Melipona quadrifasciata and Scaptotrigona aff. depilis, and with the invasive Africanized honeybee, Apis mellifera. These three species present very different recruitment strategies, which could be related with different odor-learning abilities. We evaluated their gustatory responsiveness and learning capability to discriminate floral odors. Gustatory responsiveness was similar for the three species, although S. aff. depilis workers showed fluctuations along the experimental period. Results for the learning assays revealed that M. quadrifasciata workers can be conditioned to discriminate floral odors in a classical differential conditioning protocol and that this discrimination is maintained 15 min after training. During conditioning, Africanized honeybees presented the highest discrimination, for M. quadrifasciata it was intermediate, and S. aff. depilis bees presented no discrimination. The differences found are discussed considering the putative different learning abilities and procedure effect for each species"
Keywords:"Animals Association Learning/*physiology Bees/*physiology Conditioning, Classical/*physiology Discrimination Learning/*physiology Feeding Behavior/physiology Odorants Reward Sense Organs/physiology Smell/*physiology Species Specificity Taste/physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineMc Cabe, S I Hartfelder, K Santana, W C Farina, W M eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Germany 2007/08/22 J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2007 Nov; 193(11):1089-99. doi: 10.1007/s00359-007-0260-8. Epub 2007 Aug 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024