Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAerobic granulation utilizing fermented municipal wastewater under low pH and alkalinity conditions in a sequencing batch reactor    Next AbstractNoninvasive and Point-of-Care Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS)-Based Breathalyzer for Mass Screening of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) under 5 min »

J Sep Sci


Title:Determination of volatile organic compounds in water using ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction followed by gas chromatography
Author(s):Leong MI; Huang SD;
Address:"Department of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan"
Journal Title:J Sep Sci
Year:2012
Volume:20120124
Issue:5-Jun
Page Number:688 - 694
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201100610
ISSN/ISBN:1615-9314 (Electronic) 1615-9306 (Linking)
Abstract:"Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are toxic compounds in the air, water and land. In the proposed method, ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction (USAEME) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has been developed for the extraction and determination of eight VOCs in water samples. The influence of each experimental parameter of this method (the type of extraction solvent, volume of extraction solvent, salt addition, sonication time and extraction temperature) was optimized. The procedure for USAEME was as follows: 15 muL of 1-bromooctane was used as the extraction solvent; 10 mL sample solution in a centrifuge tube with a cover was then placed in an ultrasonic water bath for 3 min. After centrifugation, 2 muL of the settled 1-bromooctane extract was injected into the GC-MS for further analysis. The optimized results indicated that the linear range is 0.1-100.0 mug/L and the limits of detection (LODs) are 0.033-0.092 mug/L for the eight analytes. The relative standard deviations (RSD), enrichment factors (EFs) and relative recoveries (RR) of the method when used on lake water samples were 2.8-9.5, 96-284 and 83-110%. The performance of the proposed method was gauged by analyzing samples of tap water, lake water and river water samples"
Keywords:"Chromatography, Gas/*methods Lakes/chemistry Liquid Phase Microextraction/instrumentation/*methods Ultrasonics Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis/*isolation & purification Water Pollutants, Chemical/*analysis/*isolation & purification;"
Notes:"MedlineLeong, Mei-I Huang, Shang-Da eng Evaluation Study Germany 2012/01/25 J Sep Sci. 2012 Mar; 35(5-6):688-94. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201100610. Epub 2012 Jan 24"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024