Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBiological activity and in vivo degradation of tritiated female sex pheromone in the male European corn borer    Next Abstract"Comparison studies of the chemical, physical, technological, and microbiological characteristics of the European roe deer, boar, red deer, and beaver hunted wild game meat" »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Moth responses to selectively fluorinated sex pheromone analogs
Author(s):Klun JA; Schwarz M; Wakabayashi N; Waters RM;
Address:"Insect Chemical Ecology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 20705-2350, Beltsville, Maryland"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:1994
Volume:20
Issue:10
Page Number:2705 - 2719
DOI: 10.1007/BF02036202
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Partially fluorinated analogs of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) female sex pheromone, 11-tetradecenyl acetate (97:3Z:E), having mono- and trifluorsubstitutions at the terminal carbon of the pheromone chain, mimicked the biological activity of the pheromone, while analogs with fluorine at either side of the double bond and a pentafluoro analog were essentially inactive. Comparison of the pheromonal activity of these analogs with the previously reported activity of similarly fluorinated pheromones in five other species of moths revealed an unpredictable relationship between fluorine substitution pattern and pheromone-mimicking activity. Fluorine substitution patterns that rendered pheromonal analogs biologically inactive in the European corn borer had no detrimental influence upon pheromonal activity in other species and the converse was also true. This is evidence that the relative importance of electronic qualities of sites within a pheromone molecule differ from species to species. Furthermore, it indicates that the biochemical components (pheromone receptor proteins, binding proteins, and enzymes) that make up moth olfactory chemosensory systems must also vary structurally from species to species, despite the fact that they are involved in olfactory sensing of compounds having very similar chemical structure"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEKlun, J A Schwarz, M Wakabayashi, N Waters, R M eng 1994/10/01 J Chem Ecol. 1994 Oct; 20(10):2705-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02036202"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-09-2024