Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDifferential preference for and activation by the odoriferous compartment of a shuttlebox in fear-conditioned and naive rats    Next AbstractIonizing irradiation effects on S-phase in checkpoint mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae »

Forensic Sci Int


Title:Determining the effects of routine fingermark detection techniques on the subsequent recovery and analysis of explosive residues on various substrates
Author(s):King S; Benson S; Kelly T; Lennard C;
Address:"National Centre for Forensic Studies, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia"
Journal Title:Forensic Sci Int
Year:2013
Volume:20130925
Issue:1-Mar
Page Number:257 - 264
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.018
ISSN/ISBN:1872-6283 (Electronic) 0379-0738 (Linking)
Abstract:"An offender who has recently handled bulk explosives would be expected to deposit latent fingermarks that are contaminated with explosive residues. However, fingermark detection techniques need to be applied in order for these fingermarks to be detected and recorded. Little information is available in terms of how routine fingermark detection methods impact on the subsequent recovery and analysis of any explosive residues that may be present. If an identifiable fingermark is obtained and that fingermark is found to be contaminated with a particular explosive then that may be crucial evidence in a criminal investigation (including acts of terrorism involving improvised explosive devices). The principal aims of this project were to investigate: (i) the typical quantities of explosive material deposited in fingermarks by someone who has recently handled bulk explosives; and (ii) the effects of routine fingermark detection methods on the subsequent recovery and analysis of explosive residues in such fingermarks. Four common substrates were studied: paper, glass, plastic (polyethylene plastic bags), and metal (aluminium foil). The target explosive compounds were 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), as well as chlorate and nitrate ions. Recommendations are provided in terms of the application of fingermark detection methods on surfaces that may contain explosive residues"
Keywords:Aluminum *Bombs Chlorates Cyanoacrylates *Dermatoglyphics *Explosive Agents Fluorescent Dyes Food Packaging Glass Humans Indans Ninhydrin Nitrates Paper Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate Plastics Powders Rhodamines Triazines Trinitrotoluene Volatilization Chlo;
Notes:"MedlineKing, Sam Benson, Sarah Kelly, Tamsin Lennard, Chris eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Ireland 2013/12/10 Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10; 233(1-3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Sep 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024