Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractJoint action of benzoxazinone derivatives and phenolic acids    Next AbstractDistributions of personal VOC exposures: a population-based analysis »

J Environ Monit


Title:"Continuous, intermittent and passive sampling of airborne VOCs"
Author(s):Jia C; Batterman S; Godwin C;
Address:"Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA"
Journal Title:J Environ Monit
Year:2007
Volume:20070823
Issue:11
Page Number:1220 - 1230
DOI: 10.1039/b708119g
ISSN/ISBN:1464-0325 (Print) 1464-0325 (Linking)
Abstract:"Long sampling periods are often advantageous or required for measuring air quality and characterizing exposures. However, sampling periods exceeding 8 to 24 h using thermally desorbable adsorbent tube (TDT) samplers for the measurement of airborne volatile organic compounds (VOCs) face several challenges, including maintaining stable and low flow rates, and avoiding breakthrough of the adsorbent. These problems may be avoided using intermittent sampling; however, the literature contains few if any reports that have evaluated this technique in environmental, occupational or other applications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate continuous, intermittent and passive sampling methods using both laboratory and real-world tests. Laboratory tests compared continuous and intermittent (active) samplers in a controlled dynamic test gas generation system. Field tests used side-by-side active and passive samplers in an office, home workshop and four smokers' homes. All samples were analyzed for a wide range of VOCs by GC-MS. In most instances, intermittent sampling yielded better reproducibility (duplicate precision of 10 +/- 6%) than continuous low-flow sampling (18 +/- 5%), in part due to difficulty maintaining low flows. Concentrations obtained using intermittent sampling agreed with those for continuous sampling, with downward biases resulting primarily from errors in flow rate measurements. In the field, more VOC species were detected using active rather than passive sampling. Passive measurements were 12% lower than continuous measurements, a difference attributed to declining uptake rates at higher concentrations over the 3 to 4 d sampling period. Overall, most measurements obtained using the three sampling methods agreed within 20% for a wide range of concentrations (0.1 to 230 microg m(-3)). Both passive and intermittent sampling approaches are suitable for long sampling periods, but intermittent sampling provides greater flexibility with respect to sampling period, and permits the use of multi-bed adsorbents that can capture a wider range of VOCs"
Keywords:Adsorption Air Pollutants/*analysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/*methods Organic Chemicals/*analysis Reproducibility of Results Volatilization;
Notes:"MedlineJia, Chunrong Batterman, Stuart Godwin, Christopher eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2007/10/31 J Environ Monit. 2007 Nov; 9(11):1220-30. doi: 10.1039/b708119g. Epub 2007 Aug 23"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-09-2024