Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractGreen solvents to enhance hydrochar quality and clarify effects of secondary char    Next AbstractAggregation substance promotes colonic mucosal invasion of Enterococcus faecalis in an ex vivo model »

Front Psychol


Title:How Semantically Labeled Scent-Gender Associations Influence the Evaluations of Scent and Texture
Author(s):Iseki S; Motoki K; Sakata R; Kitagami S;
Address:"Department of Management, Chukyo University, Nagoya, Japan. Department of Food Science and Business, Miyagi University, Sendai, Japan. Department of Informatics and Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan"
Journal Title:Front Psychol
Year:2021
Volume:20211021
Issue:
Page Number:713329 -
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713329
ISSN/ISBN:1664-1078 (Print) 1664-1078 (Electronic) 1664-1078 (Linking)
Abstract:"Sensory evaluation can be influenced by semantic information such as gender descriptions. Gender categories are associated with tactile information (e.g., female = soft/smooth, while male = hard/rough). Feminine scents (e.g., floral) are typically perceived as soft and smooth. Thus, semantic labels of gender (feminine/masculine qualities) may influence congruent sensory evaluation (i.e., female = soft/smooth, male = hard/rough). This study examined how semantically labeled scent-gender associations influence the evaluation of scent and texture. Specifically, we examined whether 'feminine' and 'masculine' labels applied to neutral scents that have not been associated with gender influence scent and haptic evaluation. Participants sniffed a feminine-labeled or masculine-labeled scent embedded on soft and rough papers. They then evaluated the scent (e.g., gender perception) and texture (e.g., hedonic evaluation). The results demonstrated that participants who sniffed a feminine-labeled (vs. masculine-labeled) scent perceived it as more feminine. However, contrary to our expectations, gender labeling of scent did not influence haptic evaluation. These findings indicate that semantic labeling of scents (i.e., feminine/masculine) may alter the gender perception of a scent but not the tactile evaluation. Practical implications for (online) sensory marketing are discussed"
Keywords:haptics multisensory experiences olfaction scent-gender associations sensory marketing;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEIseki, Sayo Motoki, Kosuke Sakata, Ryosuke Kitagami, Shinji eng Switzerland 2021/11/09 Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21; 12:713329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713329. eCollection 2021"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024