Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe effects of active chlorine on photooxidation of 2-methyl-2-butene    Next AbstractElaborate regulations of the predator-induced polyphenism in the water flea Daphnia pulex: kairomone-sensitive periods and life-history tradeoffs »

Environ Entomol


Title:A mechanical plant defense defines the opening of a phenological window for gall induction by Asphondylia aucubae (Cecidomyiidae: Diptera)
Author(s):Imai K; Ohsaki N;
Address:"Department of Environmental and Architectural Design, Faculty of Human Science, Osaka University of Human Science, Shojaku, 1-4-1, Settsu, Osaka 566-8501, Japan. k-imai@kun.ohs.ac.jp"
Journal Title:Environ Entomol
Year:2009
Volume:38
Issue:2
Page Number:404 - 410
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0213
ISSN/ISBN:0046-225X (Print) 0046-225X (Linking)
Abstract:"Many insect herbivores can only use hosts during a specific phenological stage, i.e., a phenological window. Previous studies have primarily examined the effects of these windows on insect herbivores, but relatively little is known about the mechanisms controlling the phenological windows. In most gall insect systems, phenological windows have been attributed to the short duration of physiologically active plant tissues that induce gall formation (reactive plant tissue). In the fruit gall midge, Asphondylia aucubae Yukawa and Ohsaki, and the host plant (i.e., Aucuba japonica) system, the disappearance of reactive plant tissue closes the phenological window, but its presence does not define the opening of the window. The hard endocarp of the fruit covers most potential oviposition sites just before the midge emergence season, but decreases in proportional cover during the emergence season. We experimentally manipulated the timing of oviposition relative to fruit development. Midges that emerged earliest and attacked fruits during their earliest developmental stages were unable to oviposit because of intact, hard endocarps, whereas their counterparts that emerged later could oviposit more readily through cracks in the endocarp. We noted possible oviposition avoidance behavior and the necessity of more frequent (repeated) ovipositor insertions to intensively stimulate the decreased reactive tissues during the latter half of the emergence season. Overall, our results indicated that the fragmentation of the defensive, hard endocarp of the host plant defines the opening of the phenological window in this plant-herbivore system"
Keywords:Animals Diptera/growth & development/*physiology Female Fruit/anatomy & histology/*growth & development Oviposition *Plant Tumors Seasons Time Factors;
Notes:"MedlineImai, Kensuke Ohsaki, Naota eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2009/04/25 Environ Entomol. 2009 Apr; 38(2):404-10. doi: 10.1603/022.038.0213"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024