Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEvaluating hazardous air pollutants in Australia    Next AbstractNeuropsychological symptoms in workers handling cargo from shipping containers and export logs »

Ann Work Expo Health


Title:Airborne Fumigants and Residual Chemicals in Shipping Containers Arriving in New Zealand
Author(s):Hinz R; Mannetje A; Glass B; McLean D; Douwes J;
Address:"Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand"
Journal Title:Ann Work Expo Health
Year:2022
Volume:66
Issue:4
Page Number:481 - 494
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxab090
ISSN/ISBN:2398-7316 (Electronic) 2398-7308 (Print) 2398-7308 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Airborne fumigants and other hazardous chemicals inside unopened shipping containers may pose a risk to workers handling containers. METHODS: Grab air samples from 490 sealed containers arriving in New Zealand were analysed for fumigants and other hazardous chemicals. We also collected grab air samples of 46 containers immediately upon opening and measured the total concentration of volatile organic compounds in real-time during ventilation. Additive Mixture Values (AMV) were calculated using the New Zealand Workplace Exposure standard (WES) and ACGIH Threshold Limit Values (TLV) of the 8-h, time-weighted average (TWA) exposure limit. Regression analyses assessed associations with container characteristics. RESULTS: Fumigants were detectable in 11.4% of sealed containers, with ethylene oxide detected most frequently (4.7%), followed by methyl bromide (3.5%). Other chemicals, mainly formaldehyde, were detected more frequently (84.7%). Fumigants and other chemicals exceeded the WES/TLV in 6.7%/7.8%, and 7.8%/20.0% of all containers, respectively. Correspondingly, they more frequently exceeded '1' for the AMV-TLV compared to the AMV-WES (25.7% versus 7.8%). In samples taken upon opening of doors, fumigants were detected in both fumigated and non-fumigated containers, but detection frequencies and exceedances of the WES, TLV, and AMVs were generally higher in fumigated containers. Detection frequencies for other chemicals were similar in fumigated and non-fumigated containers, and only formaldehyde exceeded both the WES and TLV in both container groups. Volatile compounds in container air reduced rapidly during ventilation. Some cargo types (tyres; personal hygiene, beauty and medical products; stone and ceramics; metal and glass; and pet food) and countries of origin (China) were associated with elevated airborne chemical and fumigant concentrations. CONCLUSION: Airborne chemicals in sealed containers frequently exceed exposure limits, both in fumigated and non-fumigated containers, and may contribute to short-term peak exposures of workers unloading or inspecting containers"
Keywords:Formaldehyde Hazardous Substances/analysis Humans New Zealand *Occupational Exposure/analysis *Pesticides/analysis exposure estimation fumigation/fumigant occupational exposure occupational groups shipping container/sea container volatile organic compound;
Notes:"MedlineHinz, Ruth 't Mannetje, Andrea Glass, Bill McLean, Dave Douwes, Jeroen eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2021/10/19 Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Apr 22; 66(4):481-494. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab090"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024