Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFragrant volatile compounds in the liverwort Drepanolejeunea madagascariensis (Steph.) Grolle: approach by the HS-SPME technique    Next AbstractDefects in orthorhombic LaMnO(3) - ionic versus electronic compensation »

Insects


Title:Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
Author(s):Gavara A; Vacas S; Navarro I; Primo J; Navarro-Llopis V;
Address:"Centro de Ecologia Quimica Agricola, Instituto Agroforestal del Mediterraneo, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Edificio 6C, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain. Ecologia y Proteccion Agricola SL, Pol. Ind. Ciutat de Carlet, 46240 Valencia, Spain"
Journal Title:Insects
Year:2020
Volume:20200509
Issue:5
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/insects11050289
ISSN/ISBN:2075-4450 (Print) 2075-4450 (Electronic) 2075-4450 (Linking)
Abstract:"Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermuller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data about field airborne pheromone concentration based on air samplings and sensitive chromatographic-spectroscopic methods. Samplings were performed in fields treated with passive dispensers or aerosol devices at different moments throughout the crop cycle to study how they act and how the disruption is triggered. Moreover, pheromone adsorption and releasing capacity of vine leaves were studied to elucidate their role in the disruption. Although both types of dispensers were effective in limiting the damage inflicted by EGVM, they performed differently and provided different airborne pheromone concentration profiles. Results also proved that leaves were able to adsorb and release part of the airborne pheromone acting as subsequent and additional pheromone sources. This fact could explain the different concentration profiles. Moreover, our results suggest that lower pheromone emission than that of the current passive dispensers still could provide an adequate performance in the field. Competitive mechanisms involved in MD using both dispensers, the dynamics of the airborne pheromone throughout the time and the importance of the canopy are discussed"
Keywords:European grapevine moth Gc-ms/ms Tortricidae aerosol devices air samples field trials passive dispensers pest control;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEGavara, Aitor Vacas, Sandra Navarro, Ismael Primo, Jaime Navarro-Llopis, Vicente eng S8456000/Conselleria de Agricultura, Medio Ambiente, Cambio Climatico y Desarrollo Rural (Generalitat Valenciana)/ Switzerland 2020/05/14 Insects. 2020 May 9; 11(5):289. doi: 10.3390/insects11050289"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024