Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffect of foliar urea fertilisation on volatile compounds in Tempranillo wine    Next AbstractNonglandular silicified trichomes are essential for rice defense against chewing herbivores »

Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess


Title:Effects of reduced levels of sulfite in wine production using mixtures with lysozyme and dimethyl dicarbonate on levels of volatile and biogenic amines
Author(s):Ancin-Azpilicueta C; Jimenez-Moreno N; Moler JA; Nieto-Rojo R; Urmeneta H;
Address:"a Departamento de Quimica Aplicada , Universidad Publica de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain. b Departamento de Estadistica e Investigacion Operativa , Universidad Publica de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain"
Journal Title:Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess
Year:2016
Volume:20160921
Issue:10
Page Number:1518 - 1526
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1232864
ISSN/ISBN:1944-0057 (Electronic) 1944-0057 (Linking)
Abstract:"Sulphur dioxide (SO(2)) is an important preservative for wine, but its presence in foods can cause allergies and this has given impetus to the research for alternatives. The aim of this study was to reduce levels of sulfite in wine production using mixtures with lysozyme and dimethyl dicarbonate and examine the influence on levels of volatile and biogenic amines. To do so, vinifications were carried out using lysozyme, dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) and mixtures of these with SO(2) in different concentrations (25 and 50 mg l(-1)). Results were compared with a control vinification with only SO(2) (50 mg l(-1)). Mixing low concentrations of SO(2) with lysozyme and DMDC reduced the concentration of biogenic amines (histamine, tyramine, putrescine, cadaverine, phenylethylamine + spermidine and spermine). In general, the total concentration of volatile amines (dimethylamine, isopropylamine, isobutylamine, pyrrolidine, ethylamine, diethylamine, amylamine and hexylamine) was higher in the sample fermented only with SO(2). The concentrations of amines with secondary amino groups (dimethylamine, diethylamine, pyrrolidine) were higher in the sample only fermented with SO(2) than those fermented with DMDC and lysozyme or with a mixture of preservatives. When SO(2) was the only preservative in wine, total amine concentration (biogenic and volatile amines) was higher than for the rest of the treatments. Lysozyme by itself, and lysozyme mixed with SO(2), both reduced the formation of biogenic amines but given the antioxidant activity of SO(2) the use of the preservative mixture seems more advisable"
Keywords:"Amines/*analysis/chemistry Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid Diethyl Pyrocarbonate/*analogs & derivatives/chemistry/metabolism Muramidase/*metabolism Sulfites/analysis/*chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis/chemistry Wine/*analysis Sulphur dio;"
Notes:"MedlineAncin-Azpilicueta, Carmen Jimenez-Moreno, Nerea Moler, Jose Antonio Nieto-Rojo, Rodrigo Urmeneta, Henar eng England 2016/09/07 Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2016 Oct; 33(10):1518-1526. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1232864. Epub 2016 Sep 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024