Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractObstructive Sleep Apnea: A View from the Back Door    Next AbstractEffect of Food Intake on Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose »

Molecules


Title:Breathing Rhythm Variations during Wash-In Do Not Influence Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose
Author(s):Dragonieri S; Quaranta VN; Carratu P; Ranieri T; Buonamico E; Carpagnano GE;
Address:"Respiratory Diseases, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy. Pulmonology, Di Venere Hospital, 70131 Bari, Italy. Internal Medicine 'A. Murri', University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy"
Journal Title:Molecules
Year:2021
Volume:20210504
Issue:9
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092695
ISSN/ISBN:1420-3049 (Electronic) 1420-3049 (Linking)
Abstract:"E-noses are innovative tools used for exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis, which have shown their potential in several diseases. Before obtaining a full validation of these instruments in clinical settings, a number of methodological issues still have to be established. We aimed to assess whether variations in breathing rhythm during wash-in with VOC-filtered air before exhaled air collection reflect changes in the exhaled VOC profile when analyzed by an e-nose (Cyranose 320). We enrolled 20 normal subjects and randomly collected their exhaled breath at three different breathing rhythms during wash-in: (a) normal rhythm (respiratory rate (RR) between 12 and 18/min), (b) fast rhythm (RR > 25/min) and (c) slow rhythm (RR < 10/min). Exhaled breath was collected by a previously validated method (Dragonieri et al., J. Bras. Pneumol. 2016) and analyzed by the e-nose. Using principal component analysis (PCA), no significant variations in the exhaled VOC profile were shown among the three breathing rhythms. Subsequent linear discriminant analysis (LDA) confirmed the above findings, with a cross-validated accuracy of 45% (p = ns). We concluded that the exhaled VOC profile, analyzed by an e-nose, is not influenced by variations in breathing rhythm during wash-in"
Keywords:Adult Analysis of Variance Breath Tests/*methods *Electronic Nose Exhalation/*physiology Female Humans Male Principal Component Analysis Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis breath analysis breathing rhythm e-nose electronic nose volatile organic compound;
Notes:"MedlineDragonieri, Silvano Quaranta, Vitaliano Nicola Carratu, Pierluigi Ranieri, Teresa Buonamico, Enrico Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana eng Switzerland 2021/06/03 Molecules. 2021 May 4; 26(9):2695. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092695"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024