Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractIrrational risk aversion in an ant    Next AbstractIdentification of the sex pheromone of the mealybug Dysmicoccus grassii Leonardi »

Elife


Title:"Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant"
Author(s):De Agro M; Matschunas C; Czaczkes TJ;
Address:"Animal Comparative Economics laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy"
Journal Title:Elife
Year:2022
Volume:20221122
Issue:
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.79314
ISSN/ISBN:2050-084X (Electronic) 2050-084X (Linking)
Abstract:"Behavioural economists have identified many psychological manipulations which affect perceived value. A prominent example of this is bundling, in which several small gains (or costs) are experienced as more valuable (or costly) than if the same total amount is presented together. While extensively demonstrated in humans, to our knowledge this effect has never been investigated in an animal, let alone an invertebrate. We trained individual Lasius niger workers to two of three conditions in which either costs (travel distance), gains (sucrose reward), or both were either bundled or segregated: (1) both costs and gains bundled, (2) both segregated, and (3) only gains segregated. We recorded pheromone deposition on the ants' return trips to the nest as measure of perceived value. After training, we offer the ants a binary choice between odours associated with the treatments. While bundling treatment did not affect binary choice, it strongly influenced pheromone deposition. Ants deposited c. 80% more pheromone when rewards were segregated but costs bundled as compared with both costs and rewards being bundled. This pattern is further complicated by the pairwise experience each animal made, and which of the treatments it experiences first during training. This demonstrates that even insects are influenced by bundling effects. We propose that the deviation between binary choice and pheromone deposition in this case may be due to a possible linearity in distance perception in ants, while almost all other sensory perception in animals is logarithmic"
Keywords:Animals Humans *Ants Pheromones Reward Odorants Sucrose Lasius niger choice comparative psychology ecology incentive salience pheromone value perception;
Notes:"MedlineDe Agro, Massimo Matschunas, Chiara Czaczkes, Tomer J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2022/11/23 Elife. 2022 Nov 22; 11:e79314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79314"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024