Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractUse of non-growing Lactococcus lactis cell suspensions for production of volatile metabolites with direct relevance for flavour formation during dairy fermentations    Next AbstractPrediction of Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Acute Leukemia by Microbiota and Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis »

J Thorac Oncol


Title:Training and Validating a Portable Electronic Nose for Lung Cancer Screening
Author(s):van de Goor R; van Hooren M; Dingemans AM; Kremer B; Kross K;
Address:"Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastrichts, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rens.vande.goor@mumc.nl. Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastrichts, The Netherlands"
Journal Title:J Thorac Oncol
Year:2018
Volume:20180206
Issue:5
Page Number:676 - 681
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.01.024
ISSN/ISBN:1556-1380 (Electronic) 1556-0864 (Linking)
Abstract:"INTRODUCTION: Profiling volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath enables the diagnosis of several types of cancer. In this study we investigated whether a portable point-of-care version of an electronic nose (e-nose) (Aeonose, [eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands]) is able to discriminate between patients with lung cancer and healthy controls on the basis of their volatile organic compound pattern. METHODS: In this study, we used five e-nose devices to collect breath samples from patients with lung cancer and healthy controls. A total of 60 patients with lung cancer and 107 controls exhaled through an e-nose for 5 minutes. Patients were assigned either to a training group for building an artificial neural network model or to a blinded control group for validating this model. RESULTS: For differentiating patients with lung cancer from healthy controls, the results showed a diagnostic accuracy of 83% with a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 84%, and area under the curve of 0.84. Results for the blinded group showed comparable results, with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 86%, and diagnostic accuracy of 86%. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study showed that this portable e-nose can properly differentiate between patients with lung cancer and healthy controls. This result could have important implications for future lung cancer screening. Further studies with larger cohorts, including also more participants with early-stage tumors, should be performed to increase the robustness of this noninvasive diagnostic tool and to determine its added value in the diagnostic chain for lung cancer"
Keywords:Aged Electronic Nose/*trends Female Humans Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology Male Middle Aged Diagnosis Electronic nose technology Lung cancer Screening Volatile organic compounds;
Notes:"Medlinevan de Goor, Rens van Hooren, Michel Dingemans, Anne-Marie Kremer, Bernd Kross, Kenneth eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2018/02/10 J Thorac Oncol. 2018 May; 13(5):676-681. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Feb 6"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-11-2024