Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPotential of solid-phase microextraction fibers for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in air    Next AbstractReversible Capture and Release of Cl(2) and Br(2) with a Redox-Active Metal-Organic Framework »

Analyst


Title:A simple calibration procedure for volatile organic compounds sampling in air with adsorptive solid-phase microextraction fibres
Author(s):Tuduri L; Desauziers V; Fanlo JL;
Address:"Laboratoire Genie de l'Environnement Industriel, Ecole des Mines d'Ales, Helioparc- 2, avenue Pierre Angot, 64053 Pau cedex, France"
Journal Title:Analyst
Year:2003
Volume:128
Issue:8
Page Number:1028 - 1032
DOI: 10.1039/b300968h
ISSN/ISBN:0003-2654 (Print) 0003-2654 (Linking)
Abstract:"Adsorptive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibres have proven to be a reliable means of sampling volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air. In this work, polydimethylsiloxane/carboxen (PDMS/CAR) fibres were used to test a new approach of air sampling strategy with SPME in the lab which could lighten calibration procedure and enhance the use of this already rapid, simple, convenient and cost effective sampling technique. Indeed, only one curve can be used whatever the extraction time chosen by the analyst under constant conditions of air velocity and temperature. Ficks' law of diffusion was used to model SPME grab sampling when the fibre was totally exposed to the air sample. Experimental sampling rates were then determined by GC-FID for different sampling conditions, i.e. in a flowing air stream of known velocity ('dynamic mode') and in a stagnant air ('static mode'). These sampling rates were found to be 3.50 and 17.80 mL min(-1) for acetone, 4.06 and 21.20 mL min(-1) for 1,2-dichloroethane, 5.10 and 27.80 mL min(-1) for toluene and 5.36 and 30.80 mL min(-1) for butyl acetate, for static and dynamic sampling modes respectively. Deviation from linearity of the calibration curves, indicating that a significant fraction of the adsorption sites are occupied, were determined. They were found to be approximately equal to 0.9, 1.57, 3.82 and 4.37 nmol for acetone, dichloroethane, toluene and butyl acetate, respectively. Experimentally determined sampling rates of these isolated compounds were also valid when a complex equimolar gaseous mixture was investigated, but deviation from linearity appears earlier. Then, for a given application, sampling times should be chosen very carefully to avoid competitive adsorption and hence, bad quantitative analysis results"
Keywords:Air Pollutants/*analysis Calibration Environmental Monitoring/*methods Organic Chemicals/*analysis Volatilization;
Notes:"MedlineTuduri, Ludovic Desauziers, Valerie Fanlo, Jean Louis eng England 2003/09/11 Analyst. 2003 Aug; 128(8):1028-32. doi: 10.1039/b300968h"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024