Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractOlfaction in context-sources of nuance in plant-pollinator communication    Next AbstractUrban ozone control and atmospheric reactivity of organic gases »

J Ecol


Title:Plant ontogeny determines strength and associated plant fitness consequences of plant-mediated interactions between herbivores and flower visitors
Author(s):Rusman Q; Lucas-Barbosa D; Hassan K; Poelman EH;
Address:Laboratory of Entomology Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands. Present address: Bio-communication & Ecology ETH Zurich Schmelzbergstrasse 9 8092 Zurich Switzerland. Present address: Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Locked Bag 1797 Penrith NSW 2751 Australia
Journal Title:J Ecol
Year:2020
Volume:20200404
Issue:3
Page Number:1046 - 1060
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13370
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0477 (Print) 1365-2745 (Electronic) 0022-0477 (Linking)
Abstract:"Plants show ontogenetic variation in growth-defence strategies to maximize reproductive output within a community context. Most work on plant ontogenetic variation in growth-defence trade-offs has focussed on interactions with antagonistic insect herbivores. Plants respond to herbivore attack with phenotypic changes. Despite the knowledge that plant responses to herbivory affect plant mutualistic interactions with pollinators required for reproduction, indirect interactions between herbivores and pollinators have not been included in the evaluation of how ontogenetic growth-defence trajectories affect plant fitness.In a common garden experiment with the annual Brassica nigra, we investigated whether exposure to various herbivore species on different plant ontogenetic stages (vegetative, bud or flowering stage) affects plant flowering traits, interactions with flower visitors and results in fitness consequences for the plant.Effects of herbivory on flowering plant traits and interactions with flower visitors depended on plant ontogeny. Plant exposure in the vegetative stage to the caterpillar Pieris brassicae and aphid Brevicoryne brassicae led to reduced flowering time and flower production, and resulted in reduced pollinator attraction, pollen beetle colonization, total seed production and seed weight. When plants had buds, infestation by most herbivore species tested reduced flower production and pollen beetle colonization. Pollinator attraction was either increased or reduced. Plants infested in the flowering stage with P. brassicae or Lipaphis erysimi flowered longer, while infestation by any of the herbivore species tested increased the number of flower visits by pollinators.Our results show that the outcome of herbivore-flower visitor interactions in B. nigra is specific for the combination of herbivore species and plant ontogenetic stage. Consequences of herbivory for flowering traits and reproductive output were strongest when plants were attacked early in life. Such differences in selection pressures imposed by herbivores to specific plant ontogenetic stages may drive the evolution of distinct ontogenetic trajectories in growth-defence-reproduction strategies and include indirect interactions between herbivores and flower visitors. Synthesis. Plant ontogeny can define the direct and indirect consequences of herbivory. Our study shows that the ontogenetic stage of plant individuals determined the effects of herbivory on plant flowering traits, interactions with flower visitors and plant fitness"
Keywords:florivores herbivore-induced plant responses indirect interactions ontogenetic trajectories ontogenetic variation plant defence plant reproduction pollinators;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINERusman, Quint Lucas-Barbosa, Dani Hassan, Kamrul Poelman, Erik H eng England 2020/05/19 J Ecol. 2020 May; 108(3):1046-1060. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13370. Epub 2020 Apr 4"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024