Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVolatile monoterpene 'fingerprints' of resinous Protium tree species in the Amazon rainforest    Next AbstractOptimisation of a simple and reliable method based on headspace solid-phase microextraction for the determination of volatile phenols in beer »

J Chem Ecol


Title:"Response of males to female sex pheromone in the orange wheat blossom midge,Sitodiplosis mosellana (Gehin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)"
Author(s):Pivnick KA;
Address:"Agriculture Canada Research Station, 107 Science Crescent, S7N 0X2, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:1993
Volume:19
Issue:8
Page Number:1677 - 1689
DOI: 10.1007/BF00982300
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Males of the orange wheat blossom midge,Sitodiplosis mosellana (Gehin), were attracted by female but not by male extract in a Y-tube bioassay. In laboratory mating experiments, females exhibited typical calling behavior under all conditions tested. At 19double daggerC in the dark, males exhibited a high frequency of wing vibration (a courtship behavior) and mating attempts, and 68% of females were mated. However, there was virtually no courtship or mating activity at 17double daggerC and 23double daggerC (0 and 11% mated, respectively); at 21double daggerC, there was an intermediate level (43% mated). Light intensity of 1500 lux (as compared to darkness), or high relative humidity (96%, as compared to 70%) also inhibited mating activity. In trapping experiments in a wheat field, males but not females were caught in significantly greater numbers in traps baited with a solvent extract of virgin females, as compared with unbaited traps, at a trap height of 20 cm. At a trap height of 60 cm above ground, no males were caught. Males did not differentiate between traps baited with two calling females and a solvent extract of two virgin females, and the latter lost little activity over 48 hr under field conditions. There was a daily rhythm of male response to receptive females or female extract each evening between 1700 and 2200 hr CST. The sensitivity of males to environmental conditions and their consequent short daily period of response in the field are thought to be related to their high susceptibility to desiccation and lack of sources of food as adults"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEPivnick, K A eng 1993/08/01 J Chem Ecol. 1993 Aug; 19(8):1677-89. doi: 10.1007/BF00982300"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024