Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSilicon: Potential to Promote Direct and Indirect Effects on Plant Defense Against Arthropod Pests in Agriculture    Next AbstractUnderstanding the effectiveness of precursor reductions in lowering 8-hr ozone concentrations »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Specialized Pheromone and Lure Application Technology as an Alternative Male Annihilation Technique to Manage Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Author(s):Reynolds OL; Osborne T; Crisp P; Barchia IM;
Address:
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2016
Volume:20160327
Issue:3
Page Number:1254 - 1260
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tow023
ISSN/ISBN:1938-291X (Electronic) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"The results of this study suggest that a novel male annihilation technique (specialized pheromone and lure application technology [SPLAT] incorporating cue-lure [CL] plus spinosad) is as effective as industry standard male annihilation controls, and is worth exploring further to manage Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) populations. Three lures were evaluated in a contact and feeding bioassay and a cage attractancy trial: 1) SPLAT-CL + spinosad; 2) SPLAT-CL without spinosad; and 3) wick-CL + malathion. In a field attraction trial, lures (1) and (3) were evaluated with a third treatment, caneite blocks-CL + malathion. Lures were weathered for 0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 wk, with an additional weathering treatment of 12 wk included in the field trial. In the contact and feeding bioassay, lures with SPLAT-CL + spinosad were >97% effective at 48 h for up to 2 wk weathering; however, wicks-CL + malathion killed B. tryoni within 2 h of exposure under all weathering periods. In the cage attractancy trial, SPLAT-CL + spinosad was as effective as, or performed better than, wicks-CL + malathion under all weathering treatments. The field study trap catches were similar for SPLAT-CL + spinosad and blocks-CL + malathion, and both had higher trap catches than wicks-CL + malathion at all weathering periods, except week 12. Overall, SPLAT-CL + spinosad compared favorably with current standard techniques for male annihilation and warrants further research. SPLAT-CL + spinosad may be a reduced-risk alternative for wicks-CL + malathion or blocks-CL + malathion for B. tryoni and other CL-responding fruit flies, such as Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett, because it contains a reduced-risk insecticide that poses a lower risk to humans and the environment and does not require labor-intensive handling and placement"
Keywords:Queensland fruit fly malathion male annihilation technique specialized pheromone and lure application technology spinosad;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEReynolds, O L Osborne, T Crisp, P Barchia, I M eng England 2016/03/29 J Econ Entomol. 2016 Mar 27; 109(3):1254-1260. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow023"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-12-2024