Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVariation of volatile terpenes in the edible fungi mycelia Flammulina velutipes and communications in fungus-mite interactions    Next AbstractVolatile disinfection byproduct formation resulting from chlorination of organic-nitrogen precursors in swimming pools »

Sci Total Environ


Title:Quantifying source contributions of volatile organic compounds under hydraulic fracking moratorium
Author(s):Li HZ; Reeder MD; Pekney NJ;
Address:"Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA. Electronic address: Zhongju.Li@netl.doe.gov. Leidos, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA"
Journal Title:Sci Total Environ
Year:2020
Volume:20200511
Issue:
Page Number:139322 -
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139322
ISSN/ISBN:1879-1026 (Electronic) 0048-9697 (Linking)
Abstract:"Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are precursors for ozone (O(3)) and secondary particulate matter, which contribute to asthma and cardiovascular diseases. With the technology development of hydraulic fracking, the United States experienced a shale gas boom in the last decade while the public raised concerns about the potential health impacts of co-emitted VOCs and other airborne pollutants. National Energy Technology Laboratory conducted stationary trailer-based ambient monitoring to study the sources of VOCs in Maryland, where the state enacted a moratorium on unconventional natural gas extraction. The campaign had two periods, May to August 2014 (summer) and November 2014 to February 2015 (winter). Ethane was the most abundant VOC, averaging 12.3 ppb (SD = 15.7 ppb) in summer and 21.7 ppb (SD = 21.6 ppb) in winter. The seasonal variation of VOCs indicated different source strengths. The sampling region was in the nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) limited regime for O(3) production, and the O(3) concentrations were sensitive to VOC/NO(x) ratios in the early mornings. We derived a six-factor profile using positive matrix factorization: motor vehicles, industrial, biogenics, coal burning, fugitive and evaporative, and ozone secondary. The fugitive and evaporative factor explained 44.5% of total VOCs, and the motor vehicles factor followed second with 15.5%. Oil and gas activities had a considerable impact on the abundance of VOCs in this region"
Keywords:Ambient monitoring Natural gas Ozone Source apportionment Volatile organic compounds;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINELi, Hugh Z Reeder, Matthew D Pekney, Natalie J eng Netherlands 2020/05/22 Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 25; 732:139322. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139322. Epub 2020 May 11"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024