Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSexual dimorphism and growth hormone induction of murine pheromone-binding proteins    Next AbstractSteroids and specialized skin secretions in mammals »

J Dairy Sci


Title:Packaging modifications for protecting flavor of extended-shelf-life milk from light
Author(s):Johnson DS; Duncan SE; Bianchi LM; Chang HH; Eigel WN; O'Keefe SF;
Address:"Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg 24061. Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg 24061. Electronic address: duncans@vt.edu"
Journal Title:J Dairy Sci
Year:2015
Volume:20150207
Issue:4
Page Number:2205 - 2214
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8857
ISSN/ISBN:1525-3198 (Electronic) 0022-0302 (Linking)
Abstract:"The effectiveness of titanium dioxide (TiO2)-loaded high-density polyethylene (HDPE) to reduce light-induced oxidation of extended-shelf-life milk (2% total fat) was studied. The objective was to determine differences over time in sensory quality, vitamin retention, and oxidative chemistry as a function of packaging and retail light exposure duration. Effectiveness of packaging for protecting milk quality was assessed by sensory evaluation (triangle tests, untrained panel), changes in volatile compounds, thiobarbituric reactive substances (TBARS), and riboflavin concentration. Milk (2%) was stored in HDPE packages consisting of TiO2 at 3 levels (low: 0.6%; medium: 1.3%; high: 4.3%) at 3 degrees C for up to 43 d. Light-protected (translucent, foil-wrapped) and light-exposed (translucent) HDPE packages served as controls. The high TiO2-HDPE package provided protection similar to light-protected control package through d 22 of light exposure, with less consistent performance by the medium TiO2 package. The TBARS increased in all treatments during storage. Under the experimental conditions used, a TBARS value of 1.3mg/L could be considered the limiting sensory threshold for differentiating oxidized milk from light-protected milk. Riboflavin concentration decreased 10.5% in the light-protected control and 28.5% in the high TiO2 packaged milk past 29 d of light exposure, but losses were greater than 40% for all other packages. The high TiO2 package protected riboflavin concentration from degradation and controlled aldehyde concentration throughout the test period"
Keywords:Animals Dietary Fats/analysis Food Handling Food Microbiology Food Packaging/*methods Food Preservation/*methods Food Storage Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Light/*adverse effects Milk/*chemistry/microbiology Oxidation-Reduction Polyethylene/chemist;
Notes:"MedlineJohnson, D S Duncan, S E Bianchi, L M Chang, H H Eigel, W N O'Keefe, S F eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2015/02/11 J Dairy Sci. 2015 Apr; 98(4):2205-14. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8857. Epub 2015 Feb 7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024