Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPassive air sampling theory for semivolatile organic compounds    Next Abstract"Prickles, latex, and tolerance in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy (Argemone glauca): variation between populations, across ontogeny, and in response to abiotic factors" »

J Chem Ecol


Title:"Orientation and feeding responses of the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus, to candytuft, Iberis amara"
Author(s):Bartlet E; Blight MM; Pickett JA; Smart LE; Turner G; Woodcock CM;
Address:"Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2004
Volume:30
Issue:5
Page Number:913 - 925
DOI: 10.1023/b:joec.0000028458.66738.e1
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"The pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus, which is an important pest of oilseed rape, Brassica napus, and turnip rape, B. rapa var. campestris, does not oviposit in all species of the Brassicaceae. The relationship between M. aeneus and candytuft, Iberis amara (Brassicacae), was investigated as part of chemical ecological studies into the development of control methods employing non-host-derived repellents. In choice and nonchoice feeding tests, M. aeneus completely rejected I. amara. However, in a field experiment using traps baited with flowering racemes of I. amara and B. napus, M. aeneus was attracted to both species. Gas chromatographic (GC) and GC-electroantennogram (GC-EAG) analyses indicated that the profiles of the floral volatiles of the two species are different. At least 12 compounds among the I. amara floral volatiles were detected by the M. aeneus antenna, and, of these, hexanoic acid, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene and alpha-cedrene were not found among B. napus flower volatiles. Since M. aeneus is stimulated by floral volatiles to approach I. amara, but rejects it near, or at, the plant surface, I. amara does not produce repellents that could be used to manipulate M. aeneus. However, it may contain feeding deterrent(s) that could be used in 'push-pull' control techniques or in the development of resistant brassicaceous crops"
Keywords:"Animals Brassicaceae/*chemistry Chromatography, Gas Coleoptera/*physiology Ecosystem Electrophysiology Feeding Behavior/*physiology Flowers/*chemistry Hexanols Oils, Volatile/analysis/chemistry/metabolism Seasons Volatilization;"
Notes:"MedlineBartlet, Elspeth Blight, Margaret M Pickett, John A Smart, Lesley E Turner, Grenville Woodcock, Christine M eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2004/07/28 J Chem Ecol. 2004 May; 30(5):913-25. doi: 10.1023/b:joec.0000028458.66738.e1"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024