Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEvaluation of the effect of a maternal rearing system on the odour profile of meat from suckling lamb    Next AbstractBreath analysis by two-dimensional gas chromatography with dual flame ionisation and mass spectrometric detection - Method optimisation and integration within a large-scale clinical study »

Environ Health Perspect


Title:Biological markers of intermediate outcomes in studies of indoor air and other complex mixtures
Author(s):Wilcosky TC;
Address:"Center for Epidemiologic and Medical Studies, Research Triangle Institute, NC 27709-2194"
Journal Title:Environ Health Perspect
Year:1993
Volume:101 Suppl 4
Issue:Suppl 4
Page Number:193 - 197
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s4193
ISSN/ISBN:0091-6765 (Print) 0091-6765 (Linking)
Abstract:"Biological markers of intermediate health outcomes sometimes provide a superior alternative to traditional measures of pollutant-related disease. Some opportunities and methodologic issues associated with using markers are discussed in the context of exposures to four complex mixtures: environmental tobacco smoke and nitrogen dioxide, acid aerosols and oxidant outdoor pollution, environmental tobacco smoke and radon, and volatile organic compounds. For markers of intermediate health outcomes, the most important property is the positive predictive value for clinical outcomes of interest. Unless the marker has a known relationship with disease, a marker response conveys no information about disease risk. Most markers are nonspecific in that various exposures cause the same marker response. Although nonspecificity can be an asset in studies of complex mixtures, it leads to problems with confounding and dilution of exposure-response associations in the presence of other exposures. The timing of a marker's measurement in relation to the occurrence of exposure influences the ability to detect a response; measurements made too early or too late may underestimate the response's magnitude. Noninvasive markers, such as those measured in urine, blood, or nasal lavage fluid, are generally more useful for field studies than are invasive markers. However, invasive markers, such as those measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or lung specimens from autopsies, provide the most direct evidence of pulmonary damage from exposure to air pollutants. Unfortunately, the lack of basic information about marker properties (e.g., sensitivity, variability, statistical link with disease) currently precludes the effective use of most markers in studies of complex mixtures"
Keywords:Aerosols/adverse effects Air Pollutants/*adverse effects Biomarkers/*analysis Environmental Monitoring/*methods Humans Hydrocarbons/adverse effects Nitrogen Dioxide/adverse effects Oxidants/adverse effects Radon/adverse effects Sensitivity and Specificity;
Notes:"MedlineWilcosky, T C eng 1993/12/01 Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):193-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s4193"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 18-11-2024