Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffect of inhaled acetone concentrations on exhaled breath acetone concentrations at rest and during exercise    Next AbstractMultiple length peptide-pheromone variants produced by Streptococcus pyogenes directly bind Rgg proteins to confer transcriptional regulation »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Leaf and floral parts feeding by orange tip butterfly larvae depends on larval position but not on glucosinolate profile or nitrogen level
Author(s):Agerbirk N; Chew FS; Olsen CE; Jorgensen K;
Address:"Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg, Denmark. nia@life.ku.dk"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2010
Volume:20101117
Issue:12
Page Number:1335 - 1345
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9880-5
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"In an attempt to identify chemical signals governing the general flower and silique feeding behavior of larvae of the orange tip butterfly, Anthocharis cardamines (L.), we investigated feeding behavior and chemistry of two major host plants: Cardamine pratensis L. and Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara & Grande (garlic mustard). Larvae reportedly feed mainly on flowers and siliques rather than leaves in nature, and did so when observed on the original host plants. Behavioral experiments, using detached A. petiolata branches, however, showed that larvae readily accepted leaves and only the final instar showed a tendency for directed movement towards floral parts. To search for semiochemicals that control plant part preference and to assess possible nutritional consequences of floral parts feeding, we determined glucosinolate profiles and total nitrogen levels of floral parts and leaves. There was only moderate difference between glucosinolate profiles of leaves and floral parts within each of two host plant species. In contrast, the profiles of floral parts differed significantly between them. A. petiolata was dominated by 2-propenyl glucosinolate, while C. pratensis was dominated by aromatic glucosinolates and branched aliphatic glucosinolates, with considerable variation among populations. Nitrogen levels tended to be higher in floral parts than in leaves in A. petiolata, but not in C. pratensis, so floral feeding could not generally be attributed to higher N content. With the exception of a tendency of last instar larvae (L5) to move to the apex and ingest flowers and upper stem, we did not find either a plant chemistry basis or larval acceptance/rejection behavior that could explain the usual feeding of floral parts by orange tip larvae of all instars. However, by artificial manipulation of vertical larval position on host plants, we found that the frequency of leaf vs. flower feeding during 24 hr depended significantly on the initial larval position. Hence, we suggest that the placement of eggs on floral parts by ovipositing female butterflies is a major explanation of orange tip feeding habits previously known from field observations"
Keywords:Animals Brassicaceae/*chemistry Butterflies/*physiology Cardamine/*chemistry Feeding Behavior/physiology Female Flowers/chemistry Glucosinolates/analysis Larva/growth & development Nitrogen/analysis Oviposition Plant Leaves/chemistry;
Notes:"MedlineAgerbirk, Niels Chew, Frances S Olsen, Carl Erik Jorgensen, Kirsten eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2010/11/18 J Chem Ecol. 2010 Dec; 36(12):1335-45. doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9880-5. Epub 2010 Nov 17"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024