Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffectiveness comparison of multiple sticky-trap configurations for sampling Pseudacteon spp. phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae)    Next AbstractThe impact of herbivore-induced plant volatiles on parasitoid foraging success: a general deterministic model »

J Chem Ecol


Title:"Impact of herbivore-induced plant volatiles on parasitoid foraging success: a spatial simulation of the Cotesia rubecula, Pieris rapae, and Brassica oleracea system"
Author(s):Puente M; Magori K; Kennedy GG; Gould F;
Address:"Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2008
Volume:20080426
Issue:7
Page Number:959 - 970
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9472-9
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Many parasitoids are known to use herbivore-induced plant volatiles as cues to locate hosts. However, data are lacking on how much of an advantage a parasitoid can gain from following these plant cues and which factors can limit the value of these cues to the parasitoid. In this study, we simulate the Cotesia rubecula-Pieris rapae-Brassica oleracea system, and ask how many more hosts can a parasitoid attack in a single day of foraging by following plant signals versus randomly foraging. We vary herbivore density, plant response time, parasitoid flight distance, and available host stages to see under which conditions parasitoids benefit from herbivore-induced plant cues. In most of the parameter combinations studied, parasitoids that responded to cues attacked more hosts than those that foraged randomly. Parasitoids following plant cues attacked up to ten times more hosts when they were able to successfully attack herbivores older than first instar; however, if parasitoids were limited to first instar hosts, those following plant cues were at a disadvantage when plants took longer than a day to respond to herbivory. At low herbivore densities, only parasitoids with a larger foraging radius could take advantage of plant cues. Although preference for herbivore-induced volatiles was not always beneficial for a parasitoid, under the most likely natural conditions, the model predicts that C. rubecula gains fitness from following plant cues"
Keywords:"Animals Brassica/*parasitology Feeding Behavior/*physiology Female Hymenoptera/growth & development/*physiology Larva/physiology Lepidoptera/growth & development/*physiology *Models, Biological;"
Notes:"MedlinePuente, Molly Magori, Krisztian Kennedy, George G Gould, Fred eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2008/04/29 J Chem Ecol. 2008 Jul; 34(7):959-70. doi: 10.1007/s10886-008-9472-9. Epub 2008 Apr 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024