Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractOdour-active compounds in papaya fruit cv. Red Maradol    Next Abstract"Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Different Parts of Zingiberkerrii Craib and Their Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activities" »

BMC Ecol


Title:The interplay between seasonality and density: consequences for female breeding decisions in a small cyclic herbivore
Author(s):Pinot A; Gauffre B; Bretagnolle V;
Address:"Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chize (CEBC-CNRS), Beauvoir sur Niort 79360, France. pinot.adrien@yahoo.fr"
Journal Title:BMC Ecol
Year:2014
Volume:20140528
Issue:
Page Number:17 -
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-14-17
ISSN/ISBN:1472-6785 (Electronic) 1472-6785 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Cyclic rodent population dynamics are subjected to both intrinsic regulatory processes such as density-dependence and extrinsic environmental forcing. Among extrinsic factors, seasonal environmental variation is understood to facilitate cycles. In rodents, these processes have been studied mostly independently and their relative importance for population dynamics is poorly known. RESULTS: We performed a detailed analysis of common vole (Microtus arvalis) reproduction in a cyclic population using a spatially extensive data set over 17 years in central-western France. Environmental seasonality was the main source of explained variation in common vole reproduction. Additionally, inter-annual variation in the environment explained a smaller part of the variance in reproduction in spring and summer than in winter, whereas the effect of density was only found in autumn and winter. In particular, we detected a strong impact of plant productivity on fecundity during the breeding season, with low vegetation productivity being able to bring vole reproduction nearly to a halt. In contrast, vole reproduction during autumn and winter was mainly shaped by intrinsic factors, with only the longer and heavier females being able to reproduce. The effect of population density on reproduction was negative, mediated by direct negative effects on the proportion of breeders in autumn and winter during outbreak years and by a delayed negative effect on litter size the following year. CONCLUSIONS: During the main breeding season, variability of female vole reproduction is predominantly shaped by food resources, suggesting that only highly productive environment may induce vole outbreaks. During fall and winter, variability of female vole reproduction is mainly controlled by intrinsic factors, with high population density suppressing reproduction. This suggests, in this cyclic population, that negative direct density dependence on reproduction could explain winter declines after outbreaks"
Keywords:"Animals Arvicolinae/*physiology Body Size Female *Fertility France Herbivory Models, Biological Population Density *Reproduction *Seasons;"
Notes:"MedlinePinot, Adrien Gauffre, Bertrand Bretagnolle, Vincent eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/06/03 BMC Ecol. 2014 May 28; 14:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-14-17"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024