Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractComparing BTEX concentration related to surgical smoke in different operating rooms    Next AbstractOdor-mediated response of gravid Aedes aegypti to mosquito-associated symbiotic bacteria »

J Food Sci


Title:"The effect of antibrowning agents on inhibition of potato browning, volatile organic compound profile, and microbial inhibition"
Author(s):Mosneaguta R; Alvarez V; Barringer SA;
Address:"Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, 2015 Fyffe Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, USA"
Journal Title:J Food Sci
Year:2012
Volume:20121026
Issue:11
Page Number:C1234 - C1240
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02957.x
ISSN/ISBN:1750-3841 (Electronic) 0022-1147 (Linking)
Abstract:"Burbank and Norkotah potato slices were dipped into 3% sodium acid sulfate (SAS), citric acid (CA), sodium erythorbate (SE), malic acid (MA), sodium acid pyrophosphate (SAPP), or a combination of SAS-CA-SE. Browning by polyphenol oxidase (PPO) obtained from potato extract with 0.04 to 0.016 g/mL of antibrowning solutions at pH 2.0 to 6.9 were measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The color of slices dipped in antibrowning solutions at pHs 2 to 7 and stored at 4 degrees C for 15 d was measured every 5 d by colorimeter. Headspace analysis of volatiles in raw and cooked potato samples was performed by selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS) and soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA) analysis of the calculated odor activity values (OAV) determined interclass distances. Microbial growth was measured at 15 d. At unadjusted pHs (1.1 to 7.1), the PPO browning of the control and samples with SAPP was not significantly different, SAS, CA, and MA produced some inhibition and SE and SAS-CA-SE prevented browning. At pH 5 to 7, only SE and SAS-CA-SE were effective browning inhibitors. Based on the color of potato slices, SE was the most effective at pH 2 to 7, but SAS was most effective at unadjusted pH. Cooking increased volatile levels in the treated potatoes and decreased differences between volatile profiles. Differences between cooked samples may not be noticeable by the consumer because volatiles with high discriminating powers have low OAVs. SAS, CA, and SAS-CA-SE treatments inhibited microbial growth but SAPP, control, and SE did not, most likely due to pH. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Antibrowning agents inhibit polyphenol oxidase, increasing shelf life and consumer acceptability of processed raw potato products by preserving the color. Their effectiveness was shown to be mainly due to a pH effect, except SE, which was not pH dependent. MA, CA, and SAS-CA-SE are better acidulants for inhibition of color change as well as growth of spoilage bacteria, yeast, and mold than SAPP, the industry standard"
Keywords:"Ascorbic Acid/chemistry Catechol Oxidase/metabolism Citric Acid/chemistry Colony Count, Microbial Color Consumer Behavior Diphosphates/chemistry Food Contamination/prevention & control Food Handling/methods Food Microbiology Food Preservation/methods Hydr;"
Notes:"MedlineMosneaguta, Ruslan Alvarez, Valente Barringer, Sheryl A eng 2012/10/31 J Food Sci. 2012 Nov; 77(11):C1234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02957.x. Epub 2012 Oct 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024