Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe effect of storage temperature and inoculum level on the time of onset of 'blown pack' spoilage    Next AbstractMass spectrometric profile of exhaled breath--field study by PTR-MS »

Chem Senses


Title:Biosecurity Dogs Detect Live Insects after Training with Odor-Proxy Training Aids: Scent Extract and Dead Specimens
Author(s):Moser AY; Brown WY; Bizo LA; Andrew NR; Taylor MK;
Address:"Canine and Equine Research Group, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia. School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia. Insect Ecology Lab, Zoology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia. Chemistry, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia"
Journal Title:Chem Senses
Year:2020
Volume:45
Issue:3
Page Number:179 - 186
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa001
ISSN/ISBN:1464-3553 (Electronic) 0379-864X (Linking)
Abstract:"Detector dogs could be trained to find invasive insect pests at borders before they establish in new areas. However, without access to the live insects themselves, odor training aids are needed to condition dogs to their scent. This proof-of-concept study assessed 2 potential training aids for insect detection: a scent extract and dead specimens of the target species. Using Musgraveia sulciventris (Hemiptera: Tessaratomidae) as an experimental model, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses were carried out to compare the chemical headspaces that make up the odors of live specimens and these 2 training aids. This was then followed by canine scent-detection testing to investigate biosecurity detector dogs' (n = 4) responses to training in an ecologically valid context. Both the scent extract and the dead specimens shared the majority of their volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with live insects. Of the dogs trained with scent extract (n = 2), both were able to detect the live insects accurately, and of those trained with dead specimens (n = 2), one detected the live insects accurately. These findings lend support for these training aids as odor-proxies for live insects-particularly scent extract, which is a relatively novel product with the potential for broad application to facilitate and improve insect-detection training"
Keywords:Animals Dogs Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Hemiptera Odorants/*analysis *Smell Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Working Dogs/*physiology Halyomorpha halys brown marmorated stink bug canine scent detection invasive insect solvent extract volatil;
Notes:"MedlineMoser, Ariella Y Brown, Wendy Y Bizo, Lewis A Andrew, Nigel R Taylor, Michelle K eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2020/01/11 Chem Senses. 2020 Apr 17; 45(3):179-186. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa001"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024