Title: | Ipsenol and ipsdienol attract Monochamus titillator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and associated large pine woodborers in southeastern United States |
Address: | "USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 Green Street, Athens, GA 30602-2044, USA. dmiller03@fs.fed.us" |
DOI: | 10.1603/0022-0493-98.6.2033 |
ISSN/ISBN: | 0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking) |
Abstract: | "We determined the responses of the southern pine sawyer, Monochamus titillator (F.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), to the pheromones (ipsenol, ipsdienol, and lanierone) used by pine engraver beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the southeastern United States. (+/-)-Ipsenol, (+/-)-ipsdienol, or a combination increased catches of M. titillator in Florida, Louisiana, Georgia, and North Carolina. Catches of Acanthocinus obsoletus (Olivier) (Cerambycidae) were increased by (+/-)-ipsenol and (+/-)-ipsdienol in Florida and North Carolina, whereas only (+/-)-ipsenol was attractive in Georgia. (+/-)-Ipsenol and (+/-)-ipsdienol were attractive to Pachylobius picivorus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Florida, whereas only (+/-)-ipsdienol was active in Louisiana. In Florida, catches of M. titillator, A. obsoletus, and P. picivorus were greatest in traps baited with both (+/-)-ipsenol and (+/-)-ipsdienol. In Louisiana, catches of the woodborer Chalcophora virginiensis (Drury) (Buprestidae) were increased by (+/-)-ipsenol. Lanierone did not affect trap catches of the aforementioned species. The combination of (+/-)-ipsenol and (+/-)-ipsdienol may be a cost-effective lure for these four species because we found no evidence of interruption in attraction to baited traps, and the cost of the lure combination is relatively low" |
Keywords: | "Acyclic Monoterpenes Alcohols/*pharmacology Animals Behavior, Animal/*drug effects Coleoptera/*drug effects Monoterpenes/*pharmacology Octanols/*pharmacology Pheromones/pharmacology Southeastern United States United States;" |
Notes: | "MedlineMiller, D R Asaro, C eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2006/03/17 J Econ Entomol. 2005 Dec; 98(6):2033-40. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.6.2033" |