Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"CMOS Amperometric ADC With High Sensitivity, Dynamic Range and Power Efficiency for Air Quality Monitoring"    Next AbstractAn Integrated Microfabricated Chip with Double Functions as an Ion Source and Air Pump Based on LIGA Technology »

J Sci Food Agric


Title:Flavor compounds and sensory profiles of a novel Chinese marinated chicken
Author(s):Li H; Li X; Zhang CH; Wang JZ; Tang CH; Chen LL;
Address:"Institute of Agro-food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Comprehensive Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing, 100193, China. College of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China"
Journal Title:J Sci Food Agric
Year:2016
Volume:20150624
Issue:5
Page Number:1618 - 1626
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7263
ISSN/ISBN:1097-0010 (Electronic) 0022-5142 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Marinating is a Chinese traditional meat-processing method using aged brine that brings popular flavor together with food safety issues. In this study a novel method named quantitative marinating (QM) was developed to improve Chinese traditional marinating (TM). Flavor compounds and sensory profiles of two marinated products were determined to verify if the improved marinating method could maintain the characteristic flavors of TM. RESULTS: Fifty-four, 60, 60, 60 and 44 volatile flavor compounds were identified from four processing stages of QM and TM respectively. Contents of taste compounds first increased and then decreased in the processing stages of QM. The total free amino acid contents of QM and TM products were 789 and 536 mg per 100 g respectively. The total nucleotide content of QM product (22.21 mg per 100 g) was higher than that of TM (20.75 mg per 100 g), while the fatty acid content of QM product (26.66 mg g(-1)) was lower than that of TM (44.43 mg g(-1)). Finally, QM received higher sensory scores than TM. CONCLUSION: Volatile flavor compounds, taste compounds and sensory properties of QM were richer than those of TM, indicating that QM can not only maintain the original aroma of TM but also have advantages in taste compounds"
Keywords:Animals Chickens China Cooking/*methods Food Handling/methods Humans Meat/*analysis Taste Temperature Volatile Organic Compounds/*chemistry Chinese traditional marinating quantitative marinating sensory evaluation taste compounds volatile flavor compounds;
Notes:"MedlineLi, Hai Li, Xia Zhang, Chun-hui Wang, Jin-zhi Tang, Chun-hong Chen, Lin-li eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2015/05/20 J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Mar 30; 96(5):1618-26. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7263. Epub 2015 Jun 24"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024