Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCharacterization of the aromatic profile of purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) during ripening by HS-SPME-GC/MS and RNA sequencing    Next AbstractCandida albicans MTLa2 regulates the mating response through both the a-factor and alpha-factor sensing pathways »

PeerJ


Title:Efficacy of an improved method to screen semiochemicals of insect
Author(s):Li C; Cao J; Wang X; Xu P; Wang X; Ren G;
Address:"Qingdao Special Crops Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China"
Journal Title:PeerJ
Year:2021
Volume:20210520
Issue:
Page Number:e11510 -
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11510
ISSN/ISBN:2167-8359 (Print) 2167-8359 (Electronic) 2167-8359 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: A combination of gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is typically used to screen active compounds that play a role in the regulation of insect behavior. This method uses two kinds of gas chromatography (GC) equipment and needs to compare compounds between the two chromatograms, and it is tedious and costly. To improve detection efficiency, as well as reduce costs and the rate of missed detection, we designed a system connecting gas chromatography (GC), electroantennography (EAG), and mass spectrometry (MS), with MS used instead of the flame ionization detector (FID) as the GC-EAD detector. To verify the feasibility of the improved method, we compare two methods-GC-EAG-MS and GC-EAD-through a series of experiments. Some researchers made similar improvements, but these were not compared with GC-EAD, and their method needed to be improved in the synchronization and split ratio. Our method has been optimized and improved in these aspects. METHODS: Helicoverpa armigera was the test organism; the improved method and conventional method were used to detect known and unknown compounds, as well as screen out active compounds that could generate responses in H. armigera antennae. RESULTS: Screening known single compounds using the two methods, the active compound benzaldehyde was detected in all seven concentrations of solution. By using the two methods, the five same active compounds of Helicoverpa armigera were detected in high concentration solution of the mixed compounds (100 mg L(-1), 50 mg L(-1)); the four same active compounds were detected at 20 mg L(-1) concentration; two identical same compounds were detected in low concentration solution (concentrations of 10 mg L(-1) and below). By using the two methods, six identical active compounds of Helicoverpa armigera were detected in unknown compounds. CONCLUSION: The improved method was consistent with the conventional method in terms of accuracy and sensitivity. However, compared with the traditional methods, Gas chromatography-electroantennographic-mass spectrometry (GC-EAG-MS) saved the cost of GC and FID equipment, thereby greatly lowering the experimental cost. In the experiment, GC-EAG-MS combined the two experimental operations of screening active substances by GC-EAD and identifying active substances by GC-MS into one, which not only reduced the experimental steps, but also avoided the false positive caused by the comparison of the two chromatograms, and it greatly reduced the difficulty level of the overall experimental analysis. GC-EAG-MS is more convenient, efficient, economical, and practical, and could confidently replace traditional methods. With further optimization, it could be widely applied in the study of plant and insect chemical ecology"
Keywords:Eag Gc-ead Gc-ms Helicoverpa armigera Sex pheromone Volatiles;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINELi, Chongyang Cao, Jianmin Wang, Xiufang Xu, Pengjun Wang, Xinwei Ren, Guangwei eng 2021/06/01 PeerJ. 2021 May 20; 9:e11510. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11510. eCollection 2021"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024