Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFaecal sludge pyrolysis: Understanding the relationships between organic composition and thermal decomposition    Next AbstractMale Pheromones Influence the Mating Behavior of Echinothrips americanus »

Behav Processes


Title:Context-dependent third-party intervention in agonistic encounters of male Przewalski horses
Author(s):Krueger K; Schneider G; Flauger B; Heinze J;
Address:"University of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitatsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: Konstanze.Krueger@hfwu.de. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Zoological Institute & Museum, Johann-Sebastian-Bach Str. 11/12, 17489 Greifswald, Germany. University of Regensburg, Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, Universitatsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany"
Journal Title:Behav Processes
Year:2015
Volume:20151023
Issue:
Page Number:54 - 62
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.009
ISSN/ISBN:1872-8308 (Electronic) 0376-6357 (Linking)
Abstract:"One mechanism to resolve conflict among group members is third party intervention, for which several functions, such as kin protection, alliance formation, and the promotion of group cohesion have been proposed. Still, empirical research on the function of intervention behaviour is rare. We studied 40 cases of intervention behaviour in a field study on 13 semi-wild bachelor horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in (a) standard social situations, and (b) when new horses joined the group (i.e. introductions). Only interventions in agonistic encounters were analysed. Eight of 13 animals directed intervention behaviour toward threatening animal in agonistic encounters of group members. One stallion was particularly active. The stallions did not intervene to support former group mates or kin and interventions were not reciprocated. In introduction situations and in standard social situations, the interveners supported animals which were lower in rank, but targeted, threatening animals of comparable social rank. After introductions, stallions received more affiliative behaviour from animals they supported and thus appeared to intervene for alliance formation. In standard social situations, interveners did not receive more affiliative behaviour from animals they supported and may primarily have intervened to promote group cohesion and to reduce social disruption within the group"
Keywords:"Aggression/*physiology/psychology Agonistic Behavior Animals Behavior, Animal Horses/*physiology/psychology Male Negotiating Social Behavior Social Dominance Equus ferus przewalskii Group conflict Rank orders Social bonds Social control Third-party interv;"
Notes:"MedlineKrueger, Konstanze Schneider, Gudrun Flauger, Birgit Heinze, Jurgen eng Netherlands 2015/10/20 Behav Processes. 2015 Dec; 121:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 23"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024