Title: | A comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas |
Author(s): | Hesterberg TW; Lapin CA; Bunn WB; |
Address: | "Navistar, Inc., 4201 Winfield Road, P.O. Box 1488, Warrenville, Illinois 60555, USA" |
ISSN/ISBN: | 0013-936X (Print) 0013-936X (Linking) |
Abstract: | "A comprehensive comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas (CNG) was developed from 25 reports on transit buses, school buses, refuse trucks, and passenger cars. Emissions for most compounds were highest for untreated exhaust emissions and lowest for treated exhaust CNG buses without after-treatment had the highest emissions of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC), volatile organic compounds (VOCs; e.g., benzene, butadiene, ethylene, etc.), and carbonyl compounds (e.g., formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein). Diesel buses without after-treatment had the highest emissions of particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Exhaust after-treatments reduced most emissions to similar levels in diesel and CNG buses. Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were similar for most vehicle types, fuels, and exhaust after-treatments with some exceptions. Diesel school buses had higher CO2 emissions than the CNG bus. CNG transit buses and passenger cars equipped with three-way catalysts had lower NO(x) emissions. Diesel buses equipped with traps had higher nitrogen dioxide emissions. Fuel economy was best in the diesel buses not equipped with exhaust after-treatment" |
Keywords: | Air Pollutants/*analysis *Fossil Fuels *Gasoline *Vehicle Emissions; |
Notes: | "MedlineHesterberg, Thomas W Lapin, Charles A Bunn, William B eng Comparative Study Review 2008/09/20 Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Sep 1; 42(17):6437-45. doi: 10.1021/es071718i" |