Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMatrix-compatible solid phase microextraction coating improves quantitative analysis of volatile profile throughout brewing stages    Next AbstractCascading effects of early-season herbivory on late-season herbivores and their parasitoids »

Electrophoresis


Title:"Highly sensitive analysis of multiple pesticides in foods combining solid-phase microextraction, capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, and chemometrics"
Author(s):Hernandez-Borges J; Rodriguez-Delgado MA; Garcia-Montelongo FJ; Cifuentes A;
Address:"Institute of Industrial Fermentations (CSIC), Madrid, Spain. Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain"
Journal Title:Electrophoresis
Year:2004
Volume:25
Issue:13
Page Number:2065 - 2076
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200405938
ISSN/ISBN:0173-0835 (Print) 0173-0835 (Linking)
Abstract:"A highly sensitive procedure to detect multiple pesticides at trace levels in foods is presented. Initially a comparative study between capillary electrophoresis (CE)-UV and CE-mass spectrometry (MS) is carried out analyzing five pesticides not studied up to now (pyrimethanil, pyrifenox, cyprodinil, cyromazine, and pirimicarb). The comparison between CE-UV and CE-MS is established in terms of separation efficiency, speed of analysis, reproducibility, and sensitivity. A good separation of these compounds is achieved by both techniques using a volatile aqueous buffer containing 0.3 M ammonium acetate/acetic acid at pH 4. Time analysis reproducibility is studied for the same day (n = 5) and three different days (n = 15), showing no significant differences between CE-UV and CE-MS. The study on peak areas reproducibility shows a slightly worse reproducibility for CE-MS compared with CE-UV. The best limit of detection (LOD) that can be achieved for these pesticides using CE-UV was 0.6 microg/mL. CE-MS provides LODs one order of magnitude better than CE-UV. Chemometrics are used to optimize the multiple parameters that play a role in solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and CE-MS analysis (e.g., extraction and desorption times, nebulizer pressure, dry gas flow, dry gas temperature, percentage of organic solvent and acid in the sheath liquid, etc.). The combined use of chemometrics and SPME-CE-MS clearly improves the LODs that can be achieved allowing the detection of pesticides at concentrations down to 15 ng/mL. The usefulness of this approach is demonstrated detecting multiple pesticides in different food samples as grapes and orange juice in a single run. The concentrations detected are below the maximum residue limits (MRLs) permitted for these pesticides in foods corroborating the value of our approach. This work demonstrates, to our knowledge for the first time, the good possibilities of the combined use of SPME-CE-MS and chemometrics"
Keywords:"Absorption Electrophoresis, Capillary/*methods Food Contamination/*analysis Mass Spectrometry/*methods Nebulizers and Vaporizers Organic Chemicals Pesticides/*analysis Pressure Reproducibility of Results Temperature Time Factors;"
Notes:"MedlineHernandez-Borges, Javier Rodriguez-Delgado, Miguel A Garcia-Montelongo, Francisco J Cifuentes, Alejandro eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Germany 2004/07/09 Electrophoresis. 2004 Jul; 25(13):2065-2076. doi: 10.1002/elps.200405938"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024