Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract[Inventory and environmental impact of VOCs emission from the typical anthropogenic sources in Sichuan province]    Next Abstract[Characteristics of O(3) Pollution and Key Precursors in Chengdu During Spring] »

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int


Title:A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater
Author(s):Han L; Qian L; Yan J; Liu R; Du Y; Chen M;
Address:"Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China. School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China. Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China. Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China. mfchen@issas.ac.cn"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Year:2016
Volume:20150910
Issue:2
Page Number:1234 - 1245
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5335-4
ISSN/ISBN:1614-7499 (Electronic) 0944-1344 (Linking)
Abstract:"In order to promote the risk-based strategy in the investigation, assessment, and remediation of Chinese brownfield sites, the Health and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA) software was developed. It is vital to validate the HERA model and compare the inter-model differences of HERA model against other available risk assessment tools. This paper discusses the similarities and differences between the Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) Tool Kit and the HERA model by evaluating the health risk of organic contaminated groundwater sources for a chemical works in China for the first time. Consequently, the HERA and RBCA models yielded the identical results for Site-Specific Assessment Criteria (SSAC) under the commercial redevelopment. However, the HERA estimated more conservative and stringent SSACs under the residential scenario based on the different exposure calculations. The inhalation of indoor vapors was the most predominated exposure pathway for all the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) determined using the RBCA and HERA models. According to the HERA model, inhalation of chloroform may cause the highest unacceptable carcinogenic risk at 2.31 x 10(-3) under the residential scenario. Therefore, it is recommended that a risk-based remedial strategy be developed to ensure the safe and sustainable redevelopment of the site"
Keywords:"China Environmental Exposure/*adverse effects/analysis Groundwater/*analysis Humans *Models, Theoretical *Risk Assessment Volatile Organic Compounds/*adverse effects/analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical/adverse effects/*analysis Groundwater Health risk ass;"
Notes:"MedlineHan, Lu Qian, Linbo Yan, Jingchun Liu, Rongqin Du, Yihua Chen, Mengfang eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Germany 2015/09/12 Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan; 23(2):1234-45. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5335-4. Epub 2015 Sep 10"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024