Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDevelopment of a photocatalytic filter to control indoor air quality    Next AbstractApplication of ultrasound to improve lees ageing processes in red wines »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:"Cost-benefit analysis of controlling the spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura)) spread and infestation of soft fruits in Trentino, Northern Italy"
Author(s):Del Fava E; Ioriatti C; Melegaro A;
Address:"Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy. Technology Transfer Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy. Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2017
Volume:20170731
Issue:11
Page Number:2318 - 2327
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4618
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: We assessed the economic impact of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) on the soft fruit industry (strawberries, raspberries, blackberries and blueberries) in Trentino, Northern Italy, using cost-benefit analysis. A conventional integrated pest management (IPM) based on insecticide, mass trapping and cultural measures is compared with an upgraded IPM strategy based on exclusion netting. Costs and benefits associated with the change between the two are estimated to evaluate the most profitable strategy from a societal point of view. The robustness of the results to uncertainty in parameter values is assessed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In a period of low pest pressure, the conventional IPM strategy would likely be more profitable than no management. However, with higher pest pressure levels, the upgraded IPM strategy would increasingly be more profitable than conventional IPM as pest damage levels increase. CONCLUSION: For the problem considered in this study, insecticide-based management is expected to prove less and less profitable as rising pest pressure levels lead to an intensification of the insecticide applications. Conversely, exclusion netting, despite being more expensive, is expected to be much more profitable, in terms of both its effectiveness in reducing pest pressure and its lower societal impact. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Animals Cost-Benefit Analysis *Drosophila Fruit/growth & development Insect Control/*economics/methods Italy Drosophila suzukii insecticide economics exclusion netting integrated pest management soft fruits;
Notes:"MedlineDel Fava, Emanuele Ioriatti, Claudio Melegaro, Alessia eng England 2017/05/20 Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Nov; 73(11):2318-2327. doi: 10.1002/ps.4618. Epub 2017 Jul 31"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024