Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Comparative transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana infested by diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae reveals signatures of stress response, secondary metabolism, and signalling"    Next AbstractA large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol »

Eur Respir J


Title:Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon
Author(s):Ehmann R; Boedeker E; Friedrich U; Sagert J; Dippon J; Friedel G; Walles T;
Address:"Ambulante Pneumologie, Stuttgart, Germany"
Journal Title:Eur Respir J
Year:2012
Volume:20110818
Issue:3
Page Number:669 - 676
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00051711
ISSN/ISBN:1399-3003 (Electronic) 0903-1936 (Linking)
Abstract:"Patient prognosis in lung cancer largely depends on early diagnosis. The exhaled breath of patients may represent the ideal specimen for future lung cancer screening. However, the clinical applicability of current diagnostic sensor technologies based on signal pattern analysis remains incalculable due to their inability to identify a clear target. To test the robustness of the presence of a so far unknown volatile organic compound in the breath of patients with lung cancer, sniffer dogs were applied. Exhalation samples of 220 volunteers (healthy individuals, confirmed lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) were presented to sniffer dogs following a rigid scientific protocol. Patient history, drug administration and clinicopathological data were analysed to identify potential bias or confounders. Lung cancer was identified with an overall sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 93%. Lung cancer detection was independent from COPD and the presence of tobacco smoke and food odours. Logistic regression identified two drugs as potential confounders. It must be assumed that a robust and specific volatile organic compound (or pattern) is present in the breath of patients with lung cancer. Additional research efforts are required to overcome the current technical limitations of electronic sensor technologies to engineer a clinically applicable screening tool"
Keywords:"Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis Adenocarcinoma of Lung Adult Aged Animals Breath Tests/methods Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/*diagnosis Dogs Early Detection of Cancer Female Food Humans Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis Male Middle Aged *Odorants Pulmonary Disease, Chronic;"
Notes:"MedlineEhmann, R Boedeker, E Friedrich, U Sagert, J Dippon, J Friedel, G Walles, T eng Controlled Clinical Trial England 2011/08/20 Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar; 39(3):669-76. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00051711. Epub 2011 Aug 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024