Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe use of a portable breath analysis device in monitoring type 1 diabetes patients in a hypoglycaemic clamp: validation with SIFT-MS data    Next AbstractSpatiotemporal within-plant distribution of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae and associated specialist and generalist predators »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Pheromone-based mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards
Author(s):Walton VM; Daane KM; Bentley WJ; Millar JG; Larsen TE; Malakar-Kuenen R;
Address:"Division of Organisms and Environment, Center for Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2006
Volume:99
Issue:4
Page Number:1280 - 1290
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-99.4.1280
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Experiments were conducted to test a mating disruption program for the mealybug Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. The sprayable, microencapsulated formulation of the racemic sex pheromone lavandulyl senecioate was applied with an air-blast sprayer, using three and four applications in 2003 and 2004, respectively. Mating disruption was combined with an application of buprofezin (2004) in June. Compared with a no-pheromone control, there were significantly lower season-long trap catches of adult males, season-long mealybug densities (2003 only), and crop damage in mating disruption plots. The amount of mealybug reduction and mechanisms that resulted in lower crop damage in mating disruption plots is discussed. In samples taken during the growing season (April to September), mealybug density was only 12.0 +/- 15.6 and 31.1 +/- 11.6% lower in the mating disruption plots than in control plots in 2003 and 2004, respectively. In the mating disruption treatment, mealybug egg production was significantly lower (2003 only), as were the proportion of ovisacs and crawlers produced. There was no treatment impact on percentage of parasitism. Mealybug density influenced treatment impact. In 2004, vines were categorized as having low, medium, or high mealybug densities during a preapplication survey. After treatment application, mealybug density was reduced by 86.3 +/- 6.3% on vines in the low mealybug density category, but it was unchanged on vines in the high density category. Another factor that reduced treatment impact was the relatively short effective lifetime of the sprayable formulation"
Keywords:"Alkenes/*pharmacology Animals California Drug Compounding Esters/*pharmacology Female Flight, Animal Hemiptera/*drug effects Host-Parasite Interactions Male Monoterpenes Population Density Population Dynamics Reproduction/drug effects Sex Attractants/*pha;"
Notes:"MedlineWalton, Vaughn M Daane, Kent M Bentley, Walter J Millar, Jocelyn G Larsen, Thomas E Malakar-Kuenen, Raksha eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2006/08/30 J Econ Entomol. 2006 Aug; 99(4):1280-90. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-99.4.1280"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024