| Title: | Performance of commercial nonmethane hydrocarbon analyzers in monitoring oxygenated volatile organic compounds emitted from animal feeding operations |
| Author(s): | Trabue S; Scoggin K; McConnell LL; Li H; Turner A; Burns R; Xin H; Gates RS; Hasson A; Ogunjemiyo S; Maghirang R; Hatfield J; |
| Address: | "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA. steven.trabue@ars.usda.gov" |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10962247.2013.804464 |
| ISSN/ISBN: | 1096-2247 (Print) 1096-2247 (Linking) |
| Abstract: | "Quantifying non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) from animal feeding operations (AFOs) is challenging due to the broad spectrum of compounds and the polar nature of the most abundant compounds. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of commercial NMHC analyzers for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) commonly emitted from AFOs. Three different NMHC analyzers were tested for response to laboratory generated VOCs, and two were tested in the field at a commercial poultry facility. The NMHC analyzers tested included gas chromatography/flame ionization detector (GC/FID), photoacoustic infrared (PA-IR) and photoionization detector (PID). The GC/FID NHHC analyzer was linear in response to nonpolar compounds, but detector response to polar oxygenated compounds were lower than expected due to poor peak shape on the column. The PA-IR NMHC instrument responded well to the calibration standard (propane), methanol, and acetone, but it performed poorly with larger alcohols and ketones and acetonitrile. The PA-IR response varied between compounds in similar compound classes. The PID responded poorly to many of the most abundant VOCs at AFOs, and it underreported alcohols by > 70%. In the field monitoring study, total NMHC concentrations were calculated from sum total of VOC determined using EPA Methods TO-15 and TO-17 with GC-MS compared to results from NMHC analyzers. NMHC GC/FID values were greater than the values calculated from the individual compound measurements. This indicated the presence of small hydrocarbons not measured with TO-15 or TO-17 such as propane. The PA-IR response was variable, but it was always lower than the GC/FID response. Results suggest that improved approaches are needed to accurately determine the VOC profile and NMHC emission rates from AFOs" |
| Keywords: | "Air Pollutants/*chemistry *Animal Husbandry Animals Environmental Monitoring Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Housing, Animal Hydrocarbons/*chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/*chemistry;" |
| Notes: | "MedlineTrabue, Steven Scoggin, Kenwood McConnell, Laura L Li, Hong Turner, Andrew Burns, Robert Xin, Hongwei Gates, Richard S Hasson, Alam Ogunjemiyo, Segun Maghirang, Ronaldo Hatfield, Jerry eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2013/11/29 J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Oct; 63(10):1163-72. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.804464" |
