Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Influence of pasture-based feeding systems on fatty acids, organic acids and volatile organic flavour compounds in yoghurt"    Next AbstractAir sampling and analysis method for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) related to field-scale mortality composting operations »

Am J Rhinol Allergy


Title:Does usage of a room air freshener affect the nasal mucosa?
Author(s):Akdag M; Bakir S; Alabalik U; Ozkurt FE; Topcu I;
Address:"Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey"
Journal Title:Am J Rhinol Allergy
Year:2014
Volume:20140911
Issue:6
Page Number:202 - 208
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4105
ISSN/ISBN:1945-8932 (Electronic) 1945-8932 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Effects of chemicals emitted from the room air freshener sprays (RAFSs) on nasal mucosa are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of RAFSs on the nasal mucosa of rats for different time intervals. METHODS: Twenty-eight rats were randomly divided into four experimental groups: group 1 (n = 7) was the control group and not exposed to RAFS or other chemicals, group 2 (n = 7) was exposed to RAFS for 1 month, group 3 (n = 7) was exposed to RAFS for 2 months, and group 4 (n = 7) was exposed to RAFS for 3 months. Samples from the nasal septum were stained using hematoxylin and eosin solution, examined by a pathologist using a light microscope, and analyzed with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We observed that distinct histopathological differences in the nasal mucosa of exposed rats depends on different time intervals (p < 0.05). Increased congestion was found after the 1st month of exposure (group 2). Although edema and mild inflammatory cell infiltration, including some eosinophils, was seen after the 2nd month (group 3), squamous metaplasia, numerous eosinophils, and intense inflammatory cell infiltration began after 3 months of exposure (group 4). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that continuous use of RAFS can cause inflammation and eosinophilic infiltration in rats, which begins after 2 months of exposure and may lead to metaplasia after 3 months. Because of differences in body size, geometry, and physiological responses of rats, the extrapolation of these results to humans is not straightforward. However, any such comparison should be made with caution. Finally, more performance is necessary to clarify this subject"
Keywords:"Aerosols/*administration & dosage/adverse effects *Air Pollution, Indoor Animals Edema/chemically induced/*immunology Eosinophils/*immunology Epithelial Cells/pathology Humans Male Metaplasia Nasal Mucosa/*immunology/pathology Nasal Obstruction/chemically;"
Notes:"MedlineAkdag, Mehmet Bakir, Salih Alabalik, Ulas Ozkurt, Fazil Emre Topcu, Ismail eng 2014/09/14 Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Nov-Dec; 28(6):202-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4105. Epub 2014 Sep 11"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-09-2024