Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractQuantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs--part 3: field experiments    Next AbstractPassive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types »

Environ Sci Process Impacts


Title:Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs--Part 4: Flow-through cell
Author(s):McAlary T; Groenevelt H; Seethapathy S; Sacco P; Crump D; Tuday M; Schumacher B; Hayes H; Johnson P; Parker L; Gorecki T;
Address:"Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., 130 Research Lane, #2, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5G3, Canada. tmcalary@geosyntec.com"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Process Impacts
Year:2014
Volume:16
Issue:5
Page Number:1103 - 1111
DOI: 10.1039/c4em00098f
ISSN/ISBN:2050-7895 (Electronic) 2050-7887 (Linking)
Abstract:"This paper presents a controlled experiment comparing several quantitative passive samplers for monitoring concentrations of volatile organic compound (VOC) vapors in soil gas using a flow-through cell. This application is simpler than conventional active sampling using adsorptive tubes because the flow rate does not need to be precisely measured and controlled, which is advantageous because the permeability of subsurface materials affects the flow rate and the permeability of geologic materials is highly variable. Using passive samplers in a flow-through cell, the flow rate may not need to be known exactly, as long as it is sufficient to purge the cell in a reasonable time and minimize any negative bias attributable to the starvation effect. An experiment was performed in a 500 mL flow-through cell using a two-factor, one-half fraction fractional factorial test design with flow rates of 80, 670 and 930 mL min(-1) and sample durations of 10, 15 and 20 minutes for each of five different passive samplers (passive Automatic Thermal Desorption Tube, Radiello(R), SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler and 3M OVM 3500). A Summa canister was collected coincident with each passive sampler and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to provide a baseline for comparison of the passive sampler concentrations. The passive sampler concentrations were within a factor of 2 of the Summa canister concentrations in 32 of 35 cases. Passive samples collected at the low flow rate and short duration showed low concentrations, which is likely attributable to insufficient purging of the cell after sampler placement"
Keywords:Air Pollutants/*analysis Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation/*methods Soil/*chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;
Notes:"MedlineMcAlary, Todd Groenevelt, Hester Seethapathy, Suresh Sacco, Paolo Crump, Derrick Tuday, Michael Schumacher, Brian Hayes, Heidi Johnson, Paul Parker, Louise Gorecki, Tadeusz eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/04/02 Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2014 May; 16(5):1103-11. doi: 10.1039/c4em00098f"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024