Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractImpact of sourdough culture on the volatile compounds in wholemeal sourdough bread    Next AbstractIdentification of the sex pheromone of Holotrichia reynaudi »

Environ Sci Process Impacts


Title:The impact of plug-in fragrance diffusers on residential indoor VOC concentrations
Author(s):Warburton T; Grange SK; Hopkins JR; Andrews SJ; Lewis AC; Owen N; Jordan C; Adamson G; Xia B;
Address:"Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. ally.lewis@ncas.ac.uk. Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Uberlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland. National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. Givaudan UK Ltd, Kennington Road, Ashford, TN24 0LT, UK. Givaudan Fragrances Corp., 717 Ridgedale Ave, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, USA. Bath & Body Works Inc., 8885 Smiths Mill Road, New Albany, OH 43054, USA"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Process Impacts
Year:2023
Volume:20230426
Issue:4
Page Number:805 - 817
DOI: 10.1039/d2em00444e
ISSN/ISBN:2050-7895 (Electronic) 2050-7887 (Linking)
Abstract:"Plug-in fragrance diffusers are one of myriad volatile organic compound-containing consumer products that are commonly found in homes. The perturbing effects of using a commercial diffuser indoors were evaluated using a study group of 60 homes in Ashford, UK. Air samples were taken over 3 day periods with the diffuser switched on and in a parallel set of control homes where it was off. At least four measurements were taken in each home using vacuum-release into 6 L silica-coated canisters and with >40 VOCs quantified using gas chromatography with FID and MS (GC-FID-QMS). Occupants self-reported their use of other VOC-containing products. The variability between homes was very high with the 72 hour sum of all measured VOCs ranging between 30 and >5000 mug m(-3), dominated by n/i-butane, propane, and ethanol. For those homes in the lowest quartile of air exchange rate (identified using CO(2) and TVOC sensors as proxies) the use of a diffuser led to a statistically significant increase (p-value < 0.02) in the summed concentration of detectable fragrance VOCs and some individual species, e.g. alpha pinene rising from a median of 9 mug m(-3) to 15 mug m(-3) (p-value < 0.02). The observed increments were broadly in line with model-calculated estimates based on fragrance weight loss, room sizes and air exchange rates"
Keywords:"Humans *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis Environmental Monitoring/methods *Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis *Air Pollutants/analysis Odorants/analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineWarburton, Thomas Grange, Stuart K Hopkins, James R Andrews, Stephen J Lewis, Alastair C Owen, Neil Jordan, Caroline Adamson, Greg Xia, Bin eng England 2023/03/09 Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2023 Apr 26; 25(4):805-817. doi: 10.1039/d2em00444e"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024