« Previous AbstractAsymmetry and directionality in production of new cell types during clonal growth: the switching pattern of homothallic yeast    Next AbstractThe mating-specific G(alpha) protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae downregulates the mating signal by a mechanism that is dependent on pheromone and independent of G(beta)(gamma) sequestration »

BMC Plant Biol

Title:		Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
Author(s):		Stratton CA; Ray S; Bradley BA; Kaye JP; Ali JG; Murrell EG;
Address:		"The Land Institute, 2440 E Water Well Rd, Salina, KS, 67401, USA. stratton@landinstitute.org. Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. The Land Institute, 2440 E Water Well Rd, Salina, KS, 67401, USA"
Journal Title:		BMC Plant Biol
Year:		2022
Volume:		20220816
Issue:		1
Page Number:		400 -
DOI:		10.1186/s12870-022-03795-3
ISSN/ISBN:		1471-2229 (Electronic) 1471-2229 (Linking)
Abstract:		"BACKGROUND: While it is known that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve nutrient acquisition and herbivore resistance in crops, the mechanisms by which AMF influence plant defense remain unknown. Plants respond to herbivory with a cascade of gene expression and phytochemical biosynthesis. Given that the production of defensive phytochemicals requires nutrients, a commonly invoked hypothesis is that the improvement to plant defense when grown with AMF is simply due to an increased availability of nutrients. An alternative hypothesis is that the AMF effect on herbivory is due to changes in plant defense gene expression that are not simply due to nutrient availability. In this study, we tested whether changes in plant defenses are regulated by nutritional provisioning alone or the response of plant to AMF associations. Maize plants grown with or without AMF and with one of three fertilizer treatments (standard, 2 x nitrogen, or 2 x phosphorous) were infested with fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda; FAW) for 72 h. We measured general plant characteristics (e.g. height, number of leaves), relative gene expression (rtPCR) of three defensive genes (lox3, mpi, and pr5), total plant N and P nutrient content, and change in FAW mass per plant. RESULTS: We found that AMF drove the defense response of maize by increasing the expression of mpi and pr5. Furthermore, while AMF increased the total phosphorous content of maize it had no impact on maize nitrogen. Fertilization alone did not alter upregulation of any of the 3 induced defense genes tested, suggesting the mechanism through which AMF upregulate defenses is not solely via increased N or P plant nutrition. CONCLUSION: This work supports that maize defense may be optimized by AMF associations alone, reducing the need for artificial inputs when managing FAW"
Keywords:		Animals Herbivory *Mycorrhizae/physiology Nitrogen Phosphorus Plant Roots Plants Spodoptera/physiology Zea mays/physiology Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Gene expression Induced defense Nutrient digests Spodoptera frugiperda Zea mays;
Notes:		"MedlineStratton, Chase A Ray, Swayamjit Bradley, Brosi A Kaye, Jason P Ali, Jared G Murrell, Ebony G eng England 2022/08/17 BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Aug 16; 22(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03795-3"