Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEvaluation of Pediococcus pentosaceus SP2 as Starter Culture on Sourdough Bread Making    Next AbstractFresh knowledge for an old relationship: new discoveries in molecular mycorrhizal research »

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev


Title:Identification of effective control technologies for additive manufacturing
Author(s):Plessis JD; Preez SD; Stefaniak AB;
Address:"Occupational Hygiene and Health Research Initiative, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA"
Journal Title:J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev
Year:2022
Volume:20220626
Issue:5
Page Number:211 - 249
DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2022.2092569
ISSN/ISBN:1521-6950 (Electronic) 1093-7404 (Print) 1093-7404 (Linking)
Abstract:"Additive manufacturing (AM) refers to several types of processes that join materials to build objects, often layer-by-layer, from a computer-aided design file. Many AM processes release potentially hazardous particles and gases during printing and associated tasks. There is limited understanding of the efficacy of controls including elimination, substitution, administrative, and personal protective technologies to reduce or remove emissions, which is an impediment to implementation of risk mitigation strategies. The Medline, Embase, Environmental Science Collection, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and other resources were used to identify 42 articles that met the inclusion criteria for this review. Key findings were as follows: 1) engineering controls for material extrusion-type fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3-D printers and material jetting printers that included local exhaust ventilation generally exhibited higher efficacy to decrease particle and gas levels compared with isolation alone, and 2) engineering controls for particle emissions from FFF 3-D printers displayed higher efficacy for ultrafine particles compared with fine particles and in test chambers compared with real-world settings. Critical knowledge gaps identified included a need for data: 1) on efficacy of controls for all AM process types, 2) better understanding approaches to control particles over a range of sizes and gas-phase emissions, 3) obtained using a standardized collection approach to facilitate inter-comparison of study results, 4) approaches that go beyond the inhalation exposure pathway to include controls to minimize dermal exposures, and 5) to evaluate not just the engineering tier, but also the prevention-through-design and other tiers of the hierarchy of controls"
Keywords:"*Air Pollution, Indoor Particulate Matter Printing, Three-Dimensional *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis Ultrafine particles filtration indoor air quality particle emission volatile organic compounds;"
Notes:"MedlinePlessis, Johan du Preez, Sonette du Stefaniak, Aleksandr B eng CC999999/ImCDC/Intramural CDC HHS/ Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Review England 2022/06/28 J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2022 Jul 4; 25(5):211-249. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2022.2092569. Epub 2022 Jun 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024