Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Morphological Characterization of the Antennal Sensilla of the Legume Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)"    Next Abstract"Evaluation of volatile compounds, phenolic acids, antioxidant potential and DFT study of essential oils from different parts of Araucaria columnaris (G. Forst.) Hook. from India" »

J Sci Food Agric


Title:Evolution of phenolic and volatile compounds during bottle storage of a white wine without added sulfite
Author(s):Pati S; Crupi P; Savastano ML; Benucci I; Esti M;
Address:"Department of the Sciences of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. CREA-VE, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Center for Viticulture and Enology, Via Casamassima, Italy. Department of Agriculture and Forestry Science (DAFNE), Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy"
Journal Title:J Sci Food Agric
Year:2020
Volume:20191011
Issue:2
Page Number:775 - 784
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10084
ISSN/ISBN:1097-0010 (Electronic) 0022-5142 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Bottle storage can affect color, aroma and phenolic composition of white wine. Very little information is reported about the bottle evolution during storage of white wines without added sulfites and/or using other antioxidants. This work is aimed at studying the evolution of the main enological parameters, phenolic and volatile profiles of a white wine without added sulfites, during 15 months of storage in bottle at different light and temperature conditions, compared with a control stored with sulfur dioxide. Dark storage at 12 degrees C (D12-S, D12-NS) and 30 degrees C (D30-S, D30-NS) were compared to investigate the temperature effect, meanwhile uncontrolled temperature and light condition (UTL-S, UTL-NS) simulated improper storage conditions. RESULTS: Volatile acidity, absorbance at 420 nm and total phenols were higher in UTL-NS and D30-NS wines. The trans forms of hydroxycinnamic esters decreased, whereas, the cis forms, as well as caffeic acid derivatives, significantly increased in samples without added sulfites. The storage without sulfites also accelerated the hydrolysis of acetate esters. However, it did not affect most of the ethyl esters whose content remained almost the same between sulfite added (S) and no sulfite added (NS) wines. CONCLUSION: The presence of sulfites in the bottle helped to preserve the volatile compounds of young wines; however, even more important seemed to be the optimal storage (dark and low temperature), as unsuitable conditions favored aroma degradation of bottled wine, regardless of sulfite protective action. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Color Food Storage/*methods Humans Hydrolysis Mass Spectrometry Odorants/analysis Phenols/*analysis Sulfites/*analysis Sulfur Dioxide/analysis Taste Temperature Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Wine/*analysis bottle storage light and temperature expos;
Notes:"MedlinePati, Sandra Crupi, Pasquale Savastano, Maria L Benucci, Ilaria Esti, Marco eng Evaluation Study England 2019/10/13 J Sci Food Agric. 2020 Jan 30; 100(2):775-784. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10084. Epub 2019 Oct 11"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024