Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLesions of hippocampus or prefrontal cortex alter species-typical behaviors in the cat    Next Abstract"Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anal Gland Secretion of European Badgers (Meles meles) Codes for Individuality, Sex and Social Group Membership" »

Bioessays


Title:Normalizing Gas-Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Data: Method Choice can Alter Biological Inference
Author(s):Noonan MJ; Tinnesand HV; Buesching CD;
Address:"Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Rd., Front Royal, VA 22630, USA. Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences, and Maritime Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, University College of Southeast Norway, 3800 Bo i Telemark, Norway. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Zoology Department, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, OX13 5QL, UK"
Journal Title:Bioessays
Year:2018
Volume:20180430
Issue:6
Page Number:e1700210 -
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700210
ISSN/ISBN:1521-1878 (Electronic) 0265-9247 (Linking)
Abstract:"We demonstrate how different normalization techniques in GC-MS analysis impart unique properties to the data, influencing any biological inference. Using simulations, and empirical data, we compare the most commonly used techniques (Total Sum Normalization 'TSN'; Median Normalization 'MN'; Probabilistic Quotient Normalization 'PQN'; Internal Standard Normalization 'ISN'; External Standard Normalization 'ESN'; and a compositional data approach 'CODA'). When differences between biological classes are pronounced, ESN and ISN provides good results, but are less reliable for more subtly differentiated groups. MN, TSN, and CODA approaches produced variable results dependent on the structure of the data, and are prone to false positive biomarker identification. In contrast, PQN exhibits the lowest false positive rate, though with occasionally poor model performance. Because ESN requires extensive pre-planning, and offers only mixed reliability, and ISN, TSN, MN, and CODA approaches are prone to introducing artefactual differences, we recommend the use of PQN in GC-MS research"
Keywords:Animals Biomarkers/chemistry Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/*methods Gc-ms biomarker identification log-ratio transformations olfactory communication pheromones pre-processing size effects;
Notes:"MedlineNoonan, Michael J Tinnesand, Helga V Buesching, Christina D eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review 2018/05/01 Bioessays. 2018 Jun; 40(6):e1700210. doi: 10.1002/bies.201700210. Epub 2018 Apr 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-09-2024