Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDimethyl disulfide produced by the naturally associated bacterium bacillus sp B55 promotes Nicotiana attenuata growth by enhancing sulfur nutrition    Next AbstractMAPK-dependent JA and SA signalling in Nicotiana attenuata affects plant growth and fitness during competition with conspecifics »

Ann Bot


Title:Defence on demand: mechanisms behind optimal defence patterns
Author(s):Meldau S; Erb M; Baldwin IT;
Address:"Department of Molecular Ecology, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany. smeldau@ice.mpg.de"
Journal Title:Ann Bot
Year:2012
Volume:20120928
Issue:8
Page Number:1503 - 1514
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs212
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8290 (Electronic) 0305-7364 (Print) 0305-7364 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: The optimal defence hypothesis (ODH) predicts that tissues that contribute most to a plant's fitness and have the highest probability of being attacked will be the parts best defended against biotic threats, including herbivores. In general, young sink tissues and reproductive structures show stronger induced defence responses after attack from pathogens and herbivores and contain higher basal levels of specialized defensive metabolites than other plant parts. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms responsible for these developmentally regulated defence patterns remain unknown. SCOPE: This review summarizes current knowledge about optimal defence patterns in above- and below-ground plant tissues, including information on basal and induced defence metabolite accumulation, defensive structures and their regulation by jasmonic acid (JA). Physiological regulations underlying developmental differences of tissues with contrasting defence patterns are highlighted, with a special focus on the role of classical plant growth hormones, including auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins and brassinosteroids, and their interactions with the JA pathway. By synthesizing recent findings about the dual roles of these growth hormones in plant development and defence responses, this review aims to provide a framework for new discoveries on the molecular basis of patterns predicted by the ODH. CONCLUSIONS: Almost four decades after its formulation, we are just beginning to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the patterns of defence allocation predicted by the ODH. A requirement for future advances will be to understand how developmental and defence processes are integrated"
Keywords:"Herbivory Plant Components, Aerial/genetics/immunology/metabolism Plant Development/*immunology Plant Diseases/*immunology Plant Growth Regulators/*metabolism *Plant Immunity Plants/genetics/*immunology/metabolism Signal Transduction/*genetics;"
Notes:"MedlineMeldau, Stefan Erb, Matthias Baldwin, Ian T eng 293926/ERC_/European Research Council/International Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review England 2012/10/02 Ann Bot. 2012 Dec; 110(8):1503-14. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs212. Epub 2012 Sep 28"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024