Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractContrasting Effects of Predation Risk and Copper on Copepod Respiration Rates    Next Abstract"Cloning, post-translational modifications, heterologous expression and ligand-binding of boar salivary lipocalin" »

Environ Entomol


Title:Monitoring grape berry moth (Paralobesia viteana: Lepidoptera) in commercial vineyards using a host plant based synthetic lure
Author(s):Loeb GM; Cha DH; Hesler SP; Linn CE; Zhang A; Teal PE; Roelofs WL;
Address:"Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, USA. gme1@cornell.edu"
Journal Title:Environ Entomol
Year:2011
Volume:40
Issue:6
Page Number:1511 - 1522
DOI: 10.1603/EN10249
ISSN/ISBN:1938-2936 (Electronic) 0046-225X (Linking)
Abstract:"For some Lepidopteran pests, such as the grape berry moth Paralobesia viteana (Clemens), poor correlation between males captured in traps baited with sex pheromone and oviposition activities of female moths has called into question the value of pheromone-based monitoring for these species. As an alternative, we compared the capture of female and male grape berry moth in panel traps baited with synthetic host volatiles with captures of males in pheromone-baited wing traps over two growing seasons in two blocks of grapes in a commercial vineyard in central New York. Lures formulated in hexane to release either 7-component or 13-component host volatile blends captured significantly more male and female grape berry moth on panel traps compared with the numbers captured on panel traps with hexane-only lures. For both sexes over both years, the same or more moths were captured in panel traps along the forest edge compared with the vineyard edge early in the season but this pattern was reversed by mid-season. Male moths captured in pheromone-baited wing traps also displayed this temporal shift in location. There was a significant positive correlation between captured males and females on panel traps although not between females captured on panel traps and males captured in pheromone-baited traps for both years suggesting pheromone traps do not accurately reflect either female or male activity. Male moths captured in pheromone traps indicated a large peak early in each season corresponding to first flight followed by lower and variable numbers that did not clearly indicate second and third flights. Panel trap data, combining males and females, indicated three distinct flights, with some overlap between the second and third flights. Peak numbers of moths captured on panel traps matched well with predictions of a temperature-based phenology model, especially in 2008. Although effective, panel traps baited with synthetic host lures were time consuming to deploy and maintain and captured relatively few moths making them impractical, in the current design, for commercial purposes"
Keywords:Animals Female Insect Control/*methods Male Moths/*drug effects/physiology New York Pheromones/*pharmacology Seasons Sex Attractants/pharmacology Sex Distribution Vitis/*chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/pharmacology;
Notes:"MedlineLoeb, Gregory M Cha, Dong H Hesler, Stephen P Linn, Charles E Jr Zhang, Aijun Teal, Peter E A Roelofs, Wendell L eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2012/01/06 Environ Entomol. 2011 Dec; 40(6):1511-22. doi: 10.1603/EN10249"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 01-07-2024